My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 10-27-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CC 10-27-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:27 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 1:40:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br /> OCTOBER 27, 2003 6 <br />. <br /> noted in staffs October 27, 2003 report and adding a condition 19 to <br /> read: The applicant shall add additional caliper inches of screening <br /> trees, including evergreens, to the west wall of the water patrol <br /> storage building in an amount approved by the City Planner, and also <br /> to allow a change in the Site Plan for the addition and relocation of <br /> the Salt/Sand building. <br /> Mr. Thompson requested Council amend Condition Number 4 to read: Applicant <br /> shall submit a revised landscaping plan for approval by the City Planner. He <br /> noted this would allow them to use the workhouse nursery, which would mean <br /> smaller trees, but additional trees being added. <br /> The Council accepted Mr. Thompson's requested change to condition number 4. <br /> The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES <br />. A. Approval of Vision and Goals for the Twin Cities Armv Ammunitions <br /> Property (TCAAP) <br /> Mr. Parrish presented a revised draft of the Vision and Goals for Twin Cities <br /> Army Ammunitions Property (TCAAP) for Council consideration and approval. <br /> He noted this document would be placed on the City's website for public review. <br /> Councilmember Larson suggested some minor changes to the document. <br /> David Hamernick, Minnesota Army National Guard, asked that there be a clear <br /> distinction between TCAAP and the Army National Guard property. He stated he <br /> did not have any problems with the goals as presented, but he wanted to see two <br /> separate definitions for the property, He expressed concern about confusion by <br /> the general public regarding what was TCAAP property and what was the Army <br /> National Guard property. <br /> Mr. Parrish suggested clarifying the definitions portion of the document to <br />. include the area currently under the jurisdiction of the National Guard and revise <br /> the existing definitions to clarify the portion of the excess TCAAP property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.