Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 19 of 20 <br /> <br />1. The application is not consistent with the policies within Chapter 6 of the Comprehensive <br />Plan: Land Use, or within and the goals of Chapter 7 of the Comprehensive Plan: Housing, <br />that encourage the incorporation of affordable and life-cycle housing into new development <br />and redevelopment where feasible. <br />2. The request for additional density, floor area ratio, and building height is not consistent <br />with Section 1355.04 Subd. 3.B of the City Code in that the proposed development does <br />not meet the goals for population density and the orderly development of the neighborhood <br />and the city within the general purpose and intent of this Zoning Code and the <br />Comprehensive Plan for the City. <br /> <br />Since the December Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant has submitted a supplemental <br />narrative to address the concerns discussed at the meeting which is included in this memo as <br />Attachment O. The Applicant has stated the goals of the City’s Comprehensive Plans that the feel <br />they are meeting. The Applicant has also stated that they will provide 10 units at 80% or less of <br />the Area Median Income (AMI). Housing that has controlled prices under this value is considered <br />affordable. The proposed rate for these units is estimated to be $336 and $625 per month. To <br />accommodate these affordable units, the Applicant has stated that they would be looking for a cost <br />savings of at least $1,300,000 for the development. The Applicant has proposed this be achieved <br />through a cash contribution or a reduction and/or waiver of City fees and charges. The Applicant <br />has not stated the size or type of unit, nor have they indicated a time when the affordable units <br />would be transitioned to market rate. <br /> <br />The City Council has the authority to waive the public use and park dedication fees required with <br />the subdivision of the property as described in Section 1130.08. <br /> <br />The City does have additional processes and means to provide financial support or business <br />subsidies to projects that meet specific purposes. These standards are established in the City of <br />Arden Hills Business Subsidy Criteria and City Public Financing Guidelines, (Public Financing <br />Guidelines) dated July 27, 2015. This process allows for the City to consider public financing <br />through tax increment financing, tax abatement, bonds, waiver of City fees (excluding building <br />permits), and other forms of public financing, provided a development meets the criteria set within <br />the standards. With the late addition of the affordable units, staff have not been able to evaluate <br />the proposed project under these standards. <br /> <br />For the project to move forward with any kind of financial support that is detailed within Public <br />Financing Guidelines, the Applicant would need to waive their rights to a timely review under <br />Minnesota Statute 15.99. The Applicant has already extended this deadline to January 13, 2025, <br />and without their consent to extend, the City must act on PC 24-018 and the tabled request for <br />Rezoning PC 24-015. <br /> <br />The Applicant also stated that the flexibility requested for F.A.R, maximum building height, and <br />density are appropriate based on the standards that have been exceeded. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br /> <br />Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on December 24, 2024. Notice was prepared by the <br />City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City received <br />one comment prior to the Planning Commission opposing the project due to concerns with <br />drainage and building placement.