Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - July 31, 2000 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Counci1member Larson expressed concern that a limit ofthree cars parked in a driveway is too <br />limiting, particularly if tour unrelated individuals reside there. Ms. Chaput stated the Planning <br />Commission's decision was based on the assumption that most properties have at least a single <br />car garage, adding it was though to be fair to allow three cars parked on the driveway. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated it is still a problem if the is no garage on the property. <br />Councilmember Aplikowski agreed, adding she would wish to see the amendment changed to a <br />limit oftour cars. <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput reviewed amendments to Section VI (E) #4 D, Barbs or Spikes on Fences, with <br />regard to Item 5, pertaining to fences. There are regulations for agricultural fences in the City. <br />Thcse types offences are typically prohibited in cities that do not have agricultural districts or <br />vacant land that may be used for agricultural purposes in the future. Staff proposes that they be <br />prohibited. <br /> <br />The term "agricultural use" is identified as a permitted and accessory use in the City. From a <br />planning perspective, encouraging agricultural uses does not meet the intentions of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. This use should be eliminated from the land use chart so that it is no <br />longer permitted. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked whether this amendment would impact the business <br />community. Ms. Chaput stated the amendment would apply to all fences within the City until <br />they are removed. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that the fence surrounding the arsenal property would be in violation of this <br />anlendment. Councilmember i\plikowski stated that some businesses should be allowed to have <br />protective fences, particularly those bordering railroad tracks. Mayor Probst suggested this <br />section could be revised to allow such fences under a special use permit only _ Ms. Chaput <br />agreed. <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput reviewed amendments to Section IX (H), Amortization of Nonconforming Use, with <br />regard to Item 6, pertaining to amortization. In the 1999 Legislative Session, the City's power to <br />amortize land uses was revoked, as stated in Chapter 96-S.F. No. 854. The only uses that a city <br />may amortize are those relating to, " . . . adult-only bookstores, adults-only theatres, or similar <br />adults-only business as defined by ordinance. . ." and for ". . . the prevention or abatement of <br />nuisances. . . or eliminating a use determined to be a public nuisance. . .". Therefore, the <br />language that is currently in the Zoning Ordinance regarding amortizing nonconforming uses <br />should be revised. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput reviewed amendments and renumbering of all pages, Sections and the Table of <br />Contents in the City of Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance, with regard to Item 7, pertaining to the <br />ordinauce numbering system. The numbering system ofthe ordinance is currently in Roman <br />numerals and is difficult to follow. Staff proposes that this be changed for ease of use as well as <br />the page numbering system, numbering pages from one (I) to the last page of the document. <br />Also, for ease of future revisions, the document should be placed in a binder with section tabs. <br />