CC 07-31-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - July 31, 2000 12 Ms. Chaput stated that the Planning Commission recommends that Planning Case #00-11, Zoning Ordinance Amendments, be approved and staffbe directed to prepare the formal ordinance for adoption at the next regular City Council meeting. Councilmember Aplikowski stated that some residences might have a problem with limiting the number of driveways. Ms. Chaput stated only one access should be permitted, but such change can not be mandated on existing homes who exceed that limit. Mayor Probst stated a variance could be requested for future cases. Ms. Aplikowski asked why tile word "paved" was used under Item 4. Ms. Chaput stated the Planning Commission decided that the term "paved" included many possibilities. Kirk Soldner, 1923 Noble Road, stated he moved to the community 13 years ago because it was different from other communities and had a rural feel. He added he believes the proposed ordinance amendments take away from the original village aspects of the community and he objects to the changes in principle as well as having some issues with the proposed wording. He noted that legislation should only be enacted if there is a demonstrated need, consideration of a variety of viewpoints, minimum legislation necessary, and anticipation of unintended consequences. Mr. Soldner stated he likes to see students in his neighborhood as long as they abide by the rules of the City. He added in his opinion it is unfair to assume that many students living in one dwelling will result in problems. He noted it is prejudiced to assume they will have numerous vehicles. Mr. Soldner suggested the following wording changes: Under Definition 43, Dwelling, replace "dwelling" with "dwelling unit". Under Definition 47, Dwelling Unit, retain existing wording. Under Dcfinition 53, Family, retain existing wording as proposed amendments are limiting. He added the proposed wording might be challenged as discriminatory. Mr. Soldner stated, with regard to Item 2, Accessory Structures, he is unsure why the term "private garage" is necessary and the existing wording should be retained. Mr. Soldner stated, with regard to Item 4, Driveways and Parking, surfaces other than paved surfaces should be acceptable and residents should be allowed to try other options. He expressed concern tbat the proposed chmlges are restrictive, and a limit ofthree cars is unacceptable. He added that the term "regular basis" should be detined. Mr. Soldner stated, with regard to Item 5, Fencing, that agricultural uses within the City should not bc discouraged, and electrical and barbed fences should be allowed for commercial properties. He added that electric fences for use in private gardens should be allowed as they are inconspicuous, harmless to humans and do not kill animals. Mr. Soldner urged the Council to enact legislation only where it is needed and address only real problems with the minimum amount of restriction imposed on residents.