My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 10-10-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CC 10-10-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:32 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:05:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - October 10 2000 12 <br /> , <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br /> . motion to approve adoption of amendments to Section VI (I) of the City of Arden <br /> Hills Zoning Ordinance, representative ofthe "Proposed" Zoning Ordinance <br /> Amendment (Antennas)" section of the staff memorandum, dated August 3, 2000. <br /> The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> E. City Hall Facility <br /> 1. Approval of Quit Claim Deed between Department of Army and the City, <br /> substantially in the form presented, subject to non-substantial changes being <br /> approved by the City Attorney and City Administrator; and Authorize the Mayor <br /> and City Administrator to Execute all necessary Documentation <br /> Mr. Lynch stated the Quit Claim Deed was forwarded to City stafffor review by the Council. He <br /> added it was requested that the document be returned with suggested amendments which the- <br /> Department of the Army mayor may not take into account. He noted that a signed document <br /> would be returned to the City to be signed by the Mayor and recorded with the County, <br /> Mayor Probst stated he is a firm advocate of all items on the agenda related to the new City Hall <br /> facility, He expressed his concern that the Council was being given the opportunity to review the <br /> Quit Claim document. He urged the Council to act affirmatively on all three items, <br /> . Councilmember Larson asked whether the Quit Claim Deed has amendments, Mr, Filla stated a <br /> change in the second paragraph of the first page refers to "Exhibit A". He added he would <br /> recommend that "Exhibit A" be recorded along with the deed. He noted this would define the <br /> doclunent in more detail. He stated he is unsure whether the National Guard would go along <br /> wi th that. <br /> Mr. Pilla stated, with regard to the easements on the second page of the Quit Claim Deed, that <br /> thcy cover a larger area than the location of the utilities, He added he spoke with a representative <br /> ofBRW who advised that the actual utilities are all located within the Highway 96 right-of-way, <br /> and therefore should not be a problem. <br /> Mr. Filla stated that the City may wish to approach the utilities companies after the deed is <br /> recorded to advise that blanket easements will not be necessary over sections of the land. He <br /> added this will not be a problem with regard to construction of the facility. <br /> Councilmember Rem requested clarification with regard to the timelines included in the Quit <br /> Claim Deed. Mr. Filla stated that all documents listed in the deed are documents of record and <br /> can be obtained from Ramsey County to determine what length of time they exist. He added he <br /> would advise that the other agrecments involving the City be recorded as they expire <br /> automatically by their terms, <br /> Mr. Lynch stated that it would be in the utility company's interest to approach the property <br /> . owner at this time to roll the easement over for another period of time, Mr. Filla stated he was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.