CC 09-10-1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Counci I Minutes -2- Sept. 10, 1973 Case No. 73-3, C. G. Rein Perform~nf!~E~ Atty. Lynden reported that the bond has not been received to date. Mr. Cecil Tammen advised that the bond will be delivered to the Vil- lage office on Thursday of this week. Atty. lynden asked ~r. Tamm3n to deliver a copy of the bond to his office as well. . Case No. 73-28, Special Use Permit - Dreyfus Interstate Developement Company lynden reviewed his draft of the Special Use Permit for Case No. 73-28. In discussion, some wording changes were suggested: I. Add "Initially" renting for ...... (Par. 2). 2. Questioned the likening of housing types to types so Ide I sewhe re. 3. Costs given were considered to be arbitrary costs - perhaps should retain base figures for each type of housing, leaving "open end" at the top. It was determined that the Council members review the Special Use Permit and advise Atty. lynden of amendments. Case No.13-16, D. H. Gustafson - Letter of September 7, 1973 Atty.Lynden read a letter from D. H. Gustafson, dated September 7, 1973, advising the Council that they have terminated their contract with Par- tridge Construction Company and that they have no Interest In pursuing their application. (A copy of the letter to be given to ~r. Partridge.) REPORT OF VilLAGE ENGINEER DONALD LUND Dunkley Surfaclno - Final Payment, Water Improvement No. 72-1 After review of the application for final payment from Dunkley Surfac- Ing, and upon recommendation by Engineer Lund, Olmen moved, seconded by Crichton, that the Council approve the final payment In the amount of $9,626.72. Motion carried unanimously. Street Improvement No. 72-3 Gale Circle Eng1neer Lund reported that he met with residents In the Street Improve- ment 72-3 area regarding complaints which were voiced at the assessment hearing on September 6, reporting that he feels these problems can be resolved rather easily. Engineer Lund said the matter wi II be pursued until the property owners are satisfied; advising there will be additional costs for survey crew, time. etc. . James Circle. In discussion of the James Johnson matter, Merrick referred to ~rs. ~cNlesh's memo regardln~ credit to Johnson for wurk he contracted for on James Circle. He said the $2,003 contracted by Mr. Johnson was for storm sewer and grading, which was done after the sewer ln~tallatlon; the Village asked him to "hold off" on this pend- Ing the water Improvement, which he did. Herrick said Johnson, as the developer, was obligated to build the road, and he feels the Vil- lage may have saved him money In Interest and in constructions costs by building the road at the same time Gale and Norma Circles were constructed. Crichton expressed concern In addlnq costs after the assessment roll was adopted; feels the costs should' have been Included In the original assessment. -2-