Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CouDell ~ecting Minutes <br /> <br />-5.. <br /> <br />;'llg. 14, 1972 <br /> <br />by the Counel i, and that a public hearing on the project be <br />scheduled for Monday, September 'I, 1912 at 8:00 p.m. at the <br />Village Hall, end that the proper officials pre~are the necessary <br />pBpers, aJI as per Resolution No. 72-51; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Sewer Extension Request, 3672 N. SnEll !loC) Avenue <br /> <br />Engineer Lund presented a fe~slblilty report, dated August 14, <br />1972, and estimated the proJect cost at $12,000. This would <br />amount to aboat $2,000 per lot, If, done. Clerk Administrator WlIS <br />directed t~ Inform thG property owners of the report and ask them <br />to mak. their wishes known. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Sealcoat Spec~flcatlons. Vi IIsgeStreets <br /> <br />MotJ on lias mada by 0 I Men, 5:econde d by Ho Henhorst, that the <br />specifications prepared byEngln~er Lund for sealcoatlng Village <br />streets be ~pproved, and that bids for the ~roJect be taken on <br />AUgUST 28, 1912 at 11:00 a.m. at the Village Hall, ~nd that the <br />Clerk Administrator l'lnd Englnaer be authorized to open the bids; <br />motIon cnrrled unanimously. <br /> <br />l~eJlIl ! r B I II <br /> <br />A bl", In the amount of $152.77, presented by Alex Chvestuik for <br />repairs to his property at Thorn Drive, .a~ denied by the Council. <br />Engineer Lund stated that the lot was seeded after the Village <br />,mprovsment proJect In the 5a~e manner as other lots of similar <br />type, and that he feelS the Job was done ;n a satisfactory manner. <br />Attorne~ Lyndan and the Village Council were In agreement with the <br />Village Engineer on the matter. <br /> <br />REPORT OF TREASURER RICHARD O'KELLY <br /> <br />envestments <br /> <br />Treasurer O'Kelly reported he hes ~pproxlmately $531,000 In Village <br />funds Invested and about $!6,800 In free cash In an~lclpatlon of <br />bills to be p&ld in September. He is receiving a r~ther poor rate <br />of an average 4.35% on the investments. <br /> <br />1971 Audi'r <br /> <br />Treasurer O'Ka~ly repor~ed a meetlno with Auditor John Mattila. <br />He stated that Mr. MattIla feels Ar~en Hills has a vsry efficIent <br />accounting system, that he Is pleased with the methods and system <br />used, and that Village accounts are In excellent shape and that <br />the accounts in Arden HIlls are far superior to any other munici- <br />pality he has audIted. <br /> <br />. <br />- <br /> <br />He reported that recommendations regardln~ purchase orders, bank <br />balances and fixed Bssets have been submitted by Auditor Mattila. <br /> <br />REPORT OF COUNCILMMli JOHN HOLlENl40HST - Planning /lnd Zc,nlng <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Case No. 72-43, Variapc~ <br /> <br />A memo w~s read to the Council from the Building Inspector recom- <br />mending a 32 It Instead ot 40 ft front sotback for the property <br />owned by Robert Now~<ln on Lake Lane. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Hol IsnhaTst, seconded by Herrick, that the <br />Council concur with ~r. Squires' recommendation for a 32 tt setback, <br />as proposed with Case No. 72-43, subject to Planning Commission <br />Chairman L. ~cGough's concurrence; motion carried unanimously. <br />PiDnnlng CommIssion members can be pol led by phone on the matter, <br />if necessary. <br /> <br />fass No. 72-~, Pemtom.~;,. P.U.D. <br /> <br />Attorney Lyndon reported on the conflnued Plann!ng Commission meeting <br />of August iO, 1972. The Pian,dng Commissien recommended special <br />UIB permit approval. subject to six conditions, whleh were read to <br />the Council bV Attorney Lynden. <br /> <br /><-5- <br />