|
<br />.
<br />
<br />C-ounct? f'..~ee";~in9 ~~inU~~.0S
<br />
<br />..2-
<br />
<br />June 12, 1972
<br />
<br />~~: t ~ h ~ i }! h"'r ~ :
<br />
<br />In the course of ou~ research we discovered that most ~unfclpalltles
<br />In the metropolitan ~rea pay all or part of the dependent coverape.
<br />Therefcr6, we recommond the Vllla~e ~o pay all the premiums on this
<br />1'roposed p! <11'1, ~'eb ase au r r.eo~mendllt I on.on race nt b ud!!et. d amounts
<br />for health, IPe and :i!',llb!lity Insl1rance.ThfJ Villars Is currently
<br />pay!np rouphly ~300.~O r~r month and has S3QO~OO b~dpeted per month
<br />for police d!sll~lllty only. '
<br />
<br />Re~ardlesB of the adopt'an of the recomrendsd plan, we woul~ recommend
<br />that the VI i lape pay the cost of dependent health coverane. Th!~
<br />would brin9 th;, totalpr curl'ently hudqeted';',:dolla.-s 1'0 $800.00 <J
<br />rnonth (approximately). Our recofl'n.,ended nin!1'conlG's to llflnroxlmBtely
<br />. $690.00 per month.
<br />
<br />~'r. Simon reported that the FI11ance COfl'mltte,e concurred wIth the suh-
<br />com,dti"ee I"Hport and, ,'ecommends that 'th<, Vlllaqelldoflt the I'rol"osl!ld
<br />new benefit p!an,essuhm!1.ted, prior to JuloVI to-avoid rate chanflGS.
<br />
<br />i"
<br />
<br />The CQunc I I d 1 scussed-~he 11 i Iln and ! ts cost,~, at I en nth . P II /InnHld
<br />that the In:lunHlce proposal Is a !lood plan"andshOu'd be adoflted.
<br />They further aoraedthatthe additional cos,t,of the plan should be
<br />conslde,.ad iln 'Increase to ,employee sa~arles}lndth8t such costs sllOuld
<br />be apportIoned by In~lviducd employee whenfheG9\inc11 next ne!1otlates
<br />~.Jap9 ch2!n~es.
<br />
<br />Motion was ~ade by HBn~erson, seconded by O+~.n~~~at the CouncIl
<br />ac<::spt The recoml~endaflons of the finance r.pmmlttee to Insurefulltlme
<br />VIHaClB employees In accordance with the Gulllrdllln,Ufe Insurance,Cp.
<br />prop.:>sa\, dated St:nl} ,7, 1972, <:lnd that the plan be IlI'plemented as ,sub-
<br />mItted. In favor: Crepeau, Oimen and HendBfsan;~pposed: Herrick.
<br />Motion <::ilrr- ad. Cou,ncllman Herrick stated tbathe Is not opposed to
<br />the Insurance plan and only objects to it uhaess It Is definitely con-
<br />s I dared par'( of a percent,,!,e increase for V'I II a(le emp loyees.
<br />
<br />Naiu,at_VeQet~tlon O!sDc~el
<br />
<br />!,ir. Richllrd HoHmann end Mr. Jos. Kahnke, residents of Arden HII Is No.3,
<br />deBcrlbed their proble.. of disposal of dead fish. seaweed and leaves
<br />that wash up on the iakeshore each sprlnp. They sURgested the possl-
<br />bll!ty of e municipal compost pile. It was noted that Pelham, New
<br />York, ~nd Rve, New York. conduct .unlclpai CD.pOS~ pilei and sell the
<br />product to local nurserles.
<br />
<br />The Council referred the pI'oblem .rD the Parks and Recreation Committee
<br />~nd the Public Works Cowmlttee asklne the~ to set up a subcommittee
<br />to study the matter. Mr. Hoffmann B~d ~r. ~ahnke volunteered ta work
<br />ulth the new subcommittee.
<br />
<br />f 2..'!!2Ji'. i "1.
<br />
<br />Mr. Alex Chvestuik, 2047 ThoM Drive, stated that he owns a vacant lot
<br />south of his home and that the or<lSS w.,s not properly restol-ad fed low-
<br />ln~ the ~ew~r and water improvements.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Fnpln..... Lund reported that he feels thnt It has been restored to its
<br />former condition.
<br />
<br />Tha Counc! I <l9ree<:i to look at the proper.ty.
<br />
<br />!,exl.!.'.!!!gn Avenue-.County Road Ll!!.!.!O[~s::!:J.2!!
<br />
<br />Assistant County Eoplnesr FloydSnyker presented updated plans for
<br />the Intersection reconstruction and traffic slanals at lexlneton Ave.
<br />and County'Road E stating that the plans are almost Identical to
<br />those presented to the Village earlier. He stated that a property ease-
<br />ment is neeeied immedlatelv at Lexington .Avenue !lnd described "the land
<br />parcel. Clerk AdminIstrator and Mayor to try to take care of the
<br />matter on June 13. Councllmnn Herrick asked about plans 'or the future
<br />Lexington AVenue 'wprove.ent and the parkinp aress at Ingerson Park.
<br />MI". Snykar ~.tated i'hat th{ll'a ll'aybe 0 "I" lCKup" and "drop off" area pro-
<br />vided far park visitors, but na provisIon for auto parklnp there has
<br />been p[-ov1ded.
<br />
<br />-2-
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|