Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 10, 2025 7 <br /> <br />City Administrator Jagoe stated the condition could be worded in such a manner that if the <br />property owner did not consent, it satisfies the condition so staff could move forward and issue <br />permits. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson indicated she did not support holding this item up, but she also wanted <br />to see if there was a way forward for the sign easement. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant supported the Council having a conversation with the property owner in order to <br />receive the easement. He stated the applicant was asking for signage and the City, as part of the <br />PUD amendment was asking for a sign easement. <br /> <br />Mr. Ferarro commented he was not requesting branded signage but rather was requesting <br />wayfinding signage. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented he would be in favor of tabling action on this item, or having approval <br />being contingent upon meeting a condition to receive an easement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden suggested this item be tabled to the February 19 Special City Council <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant supported this recommendation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber inquired if the City would deny the sign request if the applicant were to <br />not allow for the sign easement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden explained she could not speculate how people would vote in the future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson indicated she would not deny the request for lack of an easement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber stated he did not believe this was an unreasonable discussion to have. <br />He commented his personal opinion was that he would not hold this item up if the easement were <br />not granted. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rousseau inquired if the request were approved, would the applicant speak with <br />the owner in good faith about the sign easement. <br /> <br />Mr. Ferarro stated he could do this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson indicated if the applicant were to say no at this time, there may be an <br />opportunity for a partnership in the future. She reviewed a proposed condition that could be made <br />a part of the motion to read: The applicant shall work with City staff to identify a location for an <br />easement in favor of the City for the purpose of a gateway sign, or combined signs. She <br />commented she was trying to find a way forward in order to not hold this item up. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant reported if a condition were added, the condition would have to be met before the <br />requested CPC/Delkor signs could go up. <br /> <br />City Administrator Jagoe reported this was the case. She explained if the applicant were to say <br />they do not want to grant the City an easement, would this satisfy the condition because they had