Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 10, 2025 8 <br /> <br />worked with City staff. Or would an easement have to be defined in order for the signs to be <br />installed. She indicated she would want this clarification from the City Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber stated he was satisfied with an assurance the representative would speak <br />with the property owner regarding the sign easement. He reiterated that this item has been <br />available for Council’s review for the past month and he did not believe it was reasonable to hold <br />it up. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden commented this item may have been available for one month, but she <br />did not believe the Councilmembers read every single item that was presented to the PTRC, the <br />EDC or Planning Commission. She apologized that she had not taken action sooner, but she <br />believed now was the time to ask for an easement. She supported staff speaking with the property <br />owner and not the sign representative. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant indicated the Councilmember Holden could not meet privately with the City <br />Council to discuss this matter prior to this meeting because this would violate the open meeting <br />law. He reported this was the Council’s first opportunity to discuss this request. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber stated he understood this was not an open meeting law item. He <br />commented the matter at hand was reaching out to applicant in a reasonable amount of time <br />regarding the easement request. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant explained he did not have a problem with Councilmember Monson’s proposed <br />amendment, except for the work with reference. He suggested the language be changed to obtain <br />an easement. He reported PUD amendments allow for give and take, which was why large <br />developments like this request flexibility with the understanding the City also has the opportunity <br />to ask for something in exchange. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson stated she was of the opinion it would be too difficult to draft a <br />condition at this meeting and noted she did not support denying the request if the applicant <br />opposed the easement. She recommended the item be moved forward and that direction be given <br />to staff to reach out to the owner to see if there was a separate pathway forward for the sign <br />easement. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant indicated he would be in favor of tabling action on this item in order to allow staff <br />to have discussions with the property owner. <br /> <br />Mr. Ferarro stated he believed his request was very elementary, noting three signs were <br />approved as part of the PUD. He indicated he was not asking for any more than three signs, but <br />rather he was asking for what code allows for logistic purposes. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant reported the Council has not had a lot of discussion regarding the requested signs <br />because the Council did not object to the signs. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />