Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 29,1999 " <br /> j <br />. Mr. Wilson stated that he had met with the Cable Commission to discuss access issues, and has <br /> testified before Joint Telecommunication Committees. He indicated that he has been following <br /> the bill to rewrite the State Statute for some time and was concerned by the City of Arden Hills <br /> standing in opposition to the legislation before the rewrite is complete. He understood that the <br /> City does not want to lose its local authority, however, he felt the authority might be best given <br /> up in return for other items the legislation may provide. An attorney representing many Cable <br /> Commissions has indicated that, due to the activities of the telecommunication and cable <br /> industries, he was inclined to agree that it might be worth while for local governments to give up <br /> the authority in return for not having to deal with upcoming issues. Litigation cases have begun <br /> to arise throughout the country and the concern is that these issues will eventually get down to <br /> the individual city level and there will be many lawsuits. <br /> Mr. Wilson stated that it was not fair that the telecommunications field was not level. <br /> Telecommunication companies that began as telephone companies are subject to certain <br /> regulations and taxes. These taxes and regulations are different for wireless and cable <br /> companies. At this time, cable companies are providing Internet access and local dial tone in <br /> addition to cable services. Additionally, telephone companies are providing Internet access, <br /> cable and movies. These companies are all competing within the same market, however, they are <br /> not competing under the same rules and are not being taxed equally. <br /> Councilmember Malone stated that he understood the Cable Commissions do not want to lose <br />. revenue. However, the City of Arden Hills wants to maintain its local authority over franchised <br /> cable companies. During a recent fiber optics npgrade the City had received numerous <br /> complaints from local citizens about their yards being dug up. The blame for these problems was <br /> placed upon the City and the concern for the City was that it must deal with the infrastructure <br /> issues. Councilmember Malone stated that he was not sure that the State of Minnesota would be <br /> able to effectively control these issues. <br /> Mr. Wilson stated that the proposed Bill did not remove the local control over infrastructure. <br /> The proposed legislation prohibits discrimination against telecommunication companies and <br /> requires that all fees must be applied evenly. Councilmember Malone noted that these fees <br /> camlot be assessed to Northern States Power Company or US West. Mr. Wilson stated that the <br /> proposed regulations state that the fees must bc applied evenly across the board. <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. Resolution #99-42, A Resolution Opposiug Proposed Legislation to Remove Loeal <br /> Authority of Franehised Cable Companies <br /> Mayor Probst stated that he supported the proposed Resolution for a number of reasons. In <br /> addition to the concerns expressed by Councilmember Malone, Mayor Probst expressed concern <br /> abont the continued erosion of community rights as it relates to State Government controls. <br />. Although he may be willing to consider some sort of legislation, he was not supportive of the <br /> current proposed legislation on the table. <br />