Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 29, 1999 4 <br /> Mayor Probst stated that one reason he wished to discuss the proposed Resolution was that the <br />. recommendation discussed sending the Resolution with correspondence din;ctly to local <br /> legislators, as well as having an official attend the Senate Sub-Committee meeting on Tuesday, <br /> December 14, 1999. Rather than dealing with this item under the Consent Calendar, he felt that <br /> the City Council should specifically discuss the recommendation. <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski expressed concern that if the City was not allowed some control <br /> rights, it would end up with no rights at all. She felt that allowing cable companies to come and <br /> go as they please would be a bad situation. Councilmember Malone concurred. <br /> Councilmember Larson felt that it might be premature to take a position on legislation that has <br /> not yet been formally introduced. He suggested that the Resolution be amended to state that, in <br /> the absence of an acceptable alternative, the City must retain its authority. He was concerned <br /> that during the Legislative session an acceptable alternative may come up. Mayor Probst stated <br /> that he would not have a problem with amending the Resolution as proposed. <br /> Councilmember Larson confirmed that the last paragraph of Resolution #99-42 would be <br /> amended to state, "...ofthe City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, in the absence of any acceptable <br /> alternative, that the City must retain its authority..." <br /> Council member Rem concurred with Councilmember Larson. She indicated that she had <br /> questioned the appropriateness of the City making such a strong statement without knowing the <br />. final contents of the Legislation. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br /> motion to adopt Resolution #99-42, A Resolution Opposing Proposed Legislation <br /> to Remove Local Authority of Franchised Cable Companies, as amended. The <br /> motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> Mayor Probst asked for a consensus ofthe City Council regarding the distribution ofthe <br /> Resolution and whether or not a Councilmember was willing to attend the Senate Sub- <br /> Committee meeting, or if a City staff member should attend the meeting. <br /> Council member Larson noted that Mr. Dave Sand was the City's cable representative. <br /> COlillcilmember Aplikowski stated that she would be available to attend the Senate Sub- <br /> Committee meeting. Councilmember Malone suggested that staff contact Mr. Sand regarding <br /> thc meeting. <br /> Mayor Probst confirmed the approval of sending the Resolution to the local legislators. The <br /> Councilmembers concurred. <br />. <br />