CC 11-17-1975 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Special Cou'lcll M'ae~t i ng November 17, 1975 Page three Case No. 75-35, Thomas and Shisley Ludlo\! - Registered Land Survey Fredlund rev i ewed' the revised R.L.S. received on 11-17-75, which In - corpora-res the cha;1ges recommc'n ded by Council ( 10-27-75) and divides the 3.4:1: acre p a rea I i ;11'0 four ( 4) tracts. McNiesh advi sed that Attorney Lynden rece i ved the revised R. L.S. and Easement Agreements today; will review and submit op I n I on In a few days. In discussion, Ludlows brief Iy reviewed content of the easement agree- ments; Council exp ressed some con ce rn re porti on of existing driveway easemen-r shown on property south of the R. L.S ., and that easement for Ingress and egress is over "existing p r i va1'-e road" .. Ludlows referred Counc I I to lettel- from Ramsey County Engl neer (I 1-5-75) . rejecting their request to obtain Coun ty -owned r.o..Wa ad Jacen l' to the R.L.S. on Old Sneil ing Avenue; as ke d that the City initiate request for th i s Uturn-back" on the I r bahal f. Council requested that Ludlows contact other property owners along Snelling Avenue re their agreement to the tu rn -back of r.o.w. as pro- posed. In discussion of sewer ava I lab i II ty to the four building lots In the R.L.S. , Lud lows advised th:lt they understand that when houses are con- structed on these lots, i-h(ey must be connocted to the City sanitary sewer system. Feyerelsen reported that he met with ~lrs . Ludlow re park dedication re qui re d as the resu It of the R. L.S " and recommends Counci I app rova I of a $1600 park contr'ibution, based on 1 and value an d contributions requl red on s i m I I al- property sp II ts (Farkas, Carl son). less cred I t for ponding and drainage area wh i ell wi I I not be b u I It upon. After discussion, \'Ioodburn moved, seconded by Feyerelsen, that Counc II ap prove the revised R. L.S. (dated 8-21-75 and rev I sed 11-6-75), and easemen'~ agreements discussed.!' subject to approval of Attorney Lynden, and that Counci I approve $!600 cash contr! butlon, in II eu of dedica- tion of land, for public sites and open spaces. Motion carried unani- mously. Case Ho. 74-3 I. Schwab -Vo II haber - 0 f flee B u I I din t:l Addition Fredlund referred Council to n emo from Bruce Lemke r-e recommended p I ant sizes and number of plantlngs con s i del"ed acceptable; estimating cost of ptantlngs, excluding sod and seed, @ $2,650.00. Wingert re v i ewe d pendi Ilg items to be depicted on rev i sed site plan, as fo II ow,>: I. Plant slzos 2 . Parking lot striping 3. Curbing 4. Lighting 5. Dumpster I oca';' I on 6. Screening 7. On-site landscaping . 8. Highway Department property landscaping as approved by Highway Department Wingert stated thai" he discussed this requirement with Mr. Park and ou.tl i nad the req u II-emen ts for him. Mr. Sch'lab advised he ~... as not aware of a letter Ii s1' i ng these pending . L - had though-r all re'~ u i remen ts had bean met; .' i I I provide a plan l,oms of site as constructed, I f this I s the req u I remen t . Counc i I referred ~1r. Schwab to Landscape Inspector's report (11-17-75), indicating that cer-tain planting, shown on plan, have not been planted. (Copy o.f report was given 1'0 ~-r. Schwab) . A f te r discussion, and review of approved site plan (dated 11-22-74) and approved High~oy Oapa r-;'men"( landscape pion, Counci I concurred that an amended site plan should be submitted showing changes from approvel" site plan of I 1-22 - 7 4 :Includlng landscape changes approved by Highway -3-