|
<br />, ,r:'li1ui"es ,ot Spacial Council ~'le0ting October 20,1975
<br />Pa,ge 1'111'''8 '
<br />
<br />Council discussed the recommendations of Rice Creek Watershed re
<br />drainase (9-26-75) and Mr. Goldberg said he plans to sdd the steep
<br />slc}les '(0 prevent arosion. '
<br />
<br />Christoffersen expi"essedsome concern re this method Of drainage I'n
<br />'ft'orthe"'f:cll'lIl1tell - wot! I cl I i kG i"o d i SCIJSS the meas ures ouf-tl ned II i th
<br />1>11"; MacLenflal1"
<br />
<br />00'11'C; I discyssedfhe existing and proposed landscaping of,thesite
<br />I'I,j,;th, Mr. Goldbe'!"~, and expressed particular concern re the,artificial .
<br />shf"lJbson the nort, s.ideof the building. Goldberg >1!xplalned, that he .
<br />proposes to 'en!arg.~ his 'dining room in this directiol'! - has found It'
<br />dl f-flcult to obtai, tf)a tree ,heights, in arti +U:lal trees,. desIgnated
<br />for this area.
<br />
<br />'. In fU"rther diSCU,SSion" Council advised Goldberg of the parkded.lcatlon
<br />" requirement, and r.~f~rred hiill to Ordinance No. 98, Section 10, as
<br />Imended by OrdinBn~9 No. 175. '
<br />
<br />Af1'er discussion, Gaunei I deferred action on Goldberg's applications
<br />WI''''';! the Caul1e; I meeting of October 27, 1975; requested Goldberg +(,'
<br />consult Planner Fradlund relandscape and site pieri (parking, lighting,
<br />curbing, etc.) and to consult with Councllman Feyerelsen re park dedl-
<br /><::<11'1 on,; drainage pian was refe,'rec! to Engineer Christoffersen and
<br />Ri e8 Creek Watersh"d to reso I ve.
<br />
<br />f.!.5.9 No. 75-39, ~Ii II iam Feyareisen - Indian Oaks Two, Prel iminary Plat
<br />Fred I und reported tha,t the P I ann i I1g Comm i S5 ion recommen ds Counc II
<br />approvai of "!-he Prel iminal"y Pla'~of Indian Caks Two, subject toth~,
<br />10 i low I n g: ! (
<br />I. The east lot 11118 of lots I and 2, block 3, be ~oved 3' to
<br />the eas'~ reducing James Avenue r.o.", from 63' to 60r. in~
<br />creasing width of lots I and 2, blcck 3 by 3',.
<br />2. James Avenue r.o....., (portion south of Indian Oaks Two, to
<br />Iridian Oaks Trail) to be 58' wide; pavement width, of entire
<br />J<\mes Avenue to be 30' (between curbs).
<br />3-. 1n'41.nOaks Court r.o.w. to be 50' in width;pavement.wldth
<br />to be 26' (between curbs), '
<br />- 4. Length of cul-de-sac is within the at-d. 98 requlreillent stand-
<br />,aras;' ther",fore, dt)es nOT I'.qui."a a variance.
<br />5. Outlot it be accept3d as a portinn of park dedlcation;c recom-
<br />mending ,'/-hat matter be referred to Parks Committee for i,ts
<br />recolll!l)e'n'dntionas to value to the City.
<br />
<br />/,'1", Buckley 5;,l'Id that the Par!(s Committee .,ii'l consider the proposed
<br />pad; dJ(HcatIoflat ii's meeting on Tuesday, October 21!;t; he:has loo~;ed
<br />at the plan, and sit", itself - '"ater storage does enhance the site; ,
<br />n!llghb0rhood ,could u:;,e the :>ond for skat,ing in winter.
<br />
<br />.Feyen) I sen exp f al "ed ,th,at the "a I kway ea,sement to thai,.West boundary, of
<br />t1\j,) , plai" (Indian Oaks Two) is In-fended to COflnect i'o the proPQsed
<br />,mc.,,;',Qi)i"ing north-sou'i"h wallo'lay f,-om Fiorill Park to Highway $16 (along
<br />'\'19s'ts,ide of toe Pal,ntom development), when cor,'pleted. Feyerelsen re~
<br />vl~.ed the sa..r and .a,ter lOCations and .treat provision to the north .
<br />. .. , , ,
<br />line"qf th~ plat ltD give eventual access to the north gropertyl. .
<br />
<br />'lric!is,~ussion, co.nce..n ',Ias '~ltpre5sed re dedlcai'lon of Outlot, A. Chrls-
<br />. iyHer'3eln suggost~ld tha1',th,~ Village consider i'ake.Over an~!I1aln,tenance '
<br />, of Ctlrtainpont1s, as pert of Vi I iageover-all drainage system (\IIoulc nee4 '
<br />a storm drainage plan lnor-der to determine -rhese areasl. Feyerelsenl,
<br />expLainsdthat Oui"lot A pone;! receives drainage from floral Park through:
<br />"ma>:i"ting dl"ar,i"g.1 ea~,eme;lt 50U)'O of. this plat; draln,3gethen flOWSjl
<br />nOFth ~rom Outlot A through dralhBge 8asement shown on I~dl.n Caks Two N
<br />plat, ' ,', !
<br />;
<br />Af,i'er discussion, Woodburn Inovad, seconded by \11ngllrt,that. GO,uncll
<br />appr,ttvo th'll Preliminary Pia't of Indl5n Oaks Two (datad '}-29-75l wIth
<br />the t1l0dificlll~jons and var,iC:,'l<:es (Nos, 1,2,3 8nd4) recommended In
<br />::Jmonded Planning CommIssion Minutes of October 7, 1975~ outlot A
<br />not b"'i accepted by the V i II age; dra i nage easement from south s fde ,of
<br />Illdl"", Oaks Court to north "f pl6t, and walkwc:Y9asement, f,rom ,cul~de-
<br />SBC to west of p~at. to be accepted by the Vi liege as pBrt~f park ded1-
<br />~ation; balance tD~e paid 'n cash. Motion cerrle_ (Woodburn, Wlngart~
<br />Cr,~peau voHng in 'favor of 'rllEl motion; fays,else',l absfllinlng).
<br />
<br />-3~
<br />
<br />_ nL---___ ___~_ ___~ ___~__ ~~
<br />
|