Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes c,f Spec! al Counci I I~eeting <br />Pa g8 th ree <br /> <br />Apri I 21, 1975 <br /> <br />Tle?o Indicated all pendln~l items will be completed this week. <br /> <br />After discussion, Councl I action re completion date and payment was <br />deferred to Councl I Meeting of Apri I 28th. <br /> <br />REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER RICHARD FREDLUND <br /> <br />Case No. 75-14, A.D. Hartmark - Lot Split and Consolidation <br />Fredlund described the request for lot split and consolidation, <br />which provides applicant with frontage on a public street; formerly <br />only access to property was a driveway easement. <br /> <br />Fredlund reported that the Planning Commission recommends Councl' <br />approval of the lot split and consolidation as requested. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Feyereisen moved, seconded by Wingert, that Councl I approve the lot <br />split and consolidation, as recommended by the Planning Commission. <br />Motion carried unanimously, <br /> <br />Case No. 75-9, Carroll Furn i ture - Vari ance <br />Fredlund reported that the Planning Commission and Board of Appeals <br />recommend Counci I approval of the four varIances requested for the <br />warehouse expansion of Carroll Furniture. <br /> <br />Fredlund <br />I. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />noted the followinq: <br />The site is limitf,d in size, with no possibi lity to <br />acquire addlitiona; land. <br />Easement on east side of property provides only access <br />to the two industr-ies north of Carrol 1- Furniture. <br />Webe r Cab i net has agreed to a II ow Carro II Fu rn i tu re <br />patrons to use their parking lot at night, which Is at <br />the height of Carroll's business. <br />There Is no Increase of retail sales floor proposed; <br />therefore, no anticipated high demand for parking space. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />L. McGough, contractor, explained that variances re parking and <br />green area are actually reduced by the expansion; number of parking <br />spaces has been increased, without increasing sales area, and <br />percentage of green area has been increased over existing situation. <br /> <br />McGough explained that covered garage In rear of proposec ware- <br />house could be deleted, but ii' was considered by the Board of Appeals <br />to be aesthetically better to provide covered storage for the truck. <br /> <br />After discussion, Crichton moved that'Counci I approve the variances. <br />as requested, and recommended for approval by the Board of Appeals <br />and Planning Commission, as per plans dated 3/28/75, namely: <br />I. Land coverage variance of approximately 5.5%. <br />2. Hard cover (b,!i Iding and parking) variance of approximately <br />I I .3%. <br />3. Rear set-back vari ance of 2 feet. <br />4 . Par fd n g va r I an ce .' h i cll p ro v i de s tor 4 1st a I Is (89 req u i re d) . <br />Motioh was seconded by Feyereisen and carried (Crichton, Feyereisen, <br />Wingert, Crepeau voting in favor of the motion; Woodburn voting <br />I n op p os I t I on ) . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Council was advised that -Application for Bui Iding Permit and <br />Construction Plans must be submitted to the Plannirrg Commission and <br />Council for approval, prior to issuance of a Building Permit by the <br />Bui Iding Inspector. <br /> <br />Case Ho~75~1, Liv-A-$naps - 8ui Idlnq Permit <br />Fredlund reported that the Planning Commission recommends Counci I <br />approval of issuance of the Building Permit for the 45' high IS' X 30' <br />structure at Liv-A-$naps, to enclose two metal storage tanks; <br />enclosure to be constructed of concrete block and painted to match <br />existing building. . <br /> <br />After review of the pians, Wingert moved, seconded by Crichton, that <br />Counci I approve Issuance of the Building Permit for the Liv-A-$nap <br />tank enclosure in accordance with plans received 3/27/75. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />-3- <br />