Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'-lin.utes of Speci a I Counc! I Meeti n9 <br />Pa ge f: ve <br /> <br />April 21,1975 <br /> <br />d) Indication th~t metal-sided homes mav be oermitted <br />In Arden Manor park - were nroMI~.d that park woul~ <br />be entirely wocd-slde homes. <br />e) Safety hazards (mob!le homes parked on streets, <br />inadequa1esnow removal, debris etc) <br /> <br />Fredlund referred Council to list of 12 recommendations in Planning <br />Commission Minutes of 4/1/75; response to these recommendations <br />by Adams (4/15/75) and response to this response by Planning <br />Commission (Planning Commission Minutes of A/15/751. <br /> <br />Crichton asked what would happen to the Arden Manor project If an <br />Ame'nde'dSpeci a I Use Permi.t I s not approved. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Wingert said that the Vi Ilage holds bonds to finish the park, and <br />he would assume construction would be pushed towa~d completion. <br /> <br />Mr. Frank Vagi, substituting for N.W. VanPutten, attorney for Adams, <br />reviewed the resident complaint list and Adams' reply to each: <br />I. garbage piCk-up has now been provided. <br />2. landscaping will be completed as soon as weather permits <br />in accordance with recommendation of landscape architect. <br />(Feyereisen noted that not one lot Is completely land- <br />'scaped - sod which has been laid has been poorly done.) <br />3. 5 lot buffer zone proposed by Planning Commission, between <br />51 lot wood-side area and balance of park which would <br />permit metal and wood homes, is agreeable to Adams. <br />4. Adams agrees to place mobile homes on lots within 24 hrs. <br />after delivery and to hook them" to utilities within 72 hrs, <br />as recommended by the Planning Commission. <br />5. Adams agrees to provide adequate plowing next winter. <br /> <br />Feyereisen noted some additional safety factors which should be <br />cons i dered: <br />I. 6" or more of standing water and mud under some of the <br />mobile homes - a potential hazard to children and probably <br />an electrical hazard as well. <br />Impossible for residents to predict when they'll <br />poor water pressure or be out of water entirely. <br />re adequacy of water supply, beyond 1st 51 lots, <br />been made. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />have <br />Test <br />has not <br /> <br />Mr. Richard DeWitt, 4651 Highway 10, expressed concern over the <br />deep cut behind houses on Highway 10, stating that water is standing <br />in this trench and a snow fence has been lying on the ground - <br />potential danger area for chi Idren. DeWitt also said the steep <br />cut has drained his lot, and neighbors lots, of water - used to <br />have fl"ult trees and a beaui'i ful lawn, but trees have died, and <br />grass is brown since cut was made. <br /> <br />Scott Hutton, resident of Arden Manor, expressed concern re adequacy <br />of the proposed Community Building for storm shelter for 200 mob; Ie <br />h orne un I ts . <br /> <br />Adams stated that Civi I Defense approves this bui Iding plan as <br />adequate storm shelter for 272 mobile home lots. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Feyere i sen noted that Arden Hi lis! Ci vi I Defense Oi rector has rai sed <br />some questi ons concern I ng the constructi on of the Commun i ty Sui I di ng <br />in his report of 4/15/75. <br /> <br />In review of the community oui Iding proposed construction, Mr. Adams <br />said the building is of block construction, with one wall of the <br />lower level exposed (walk-out), providing 3,300 sq. fe,et (gross area) <br />on I owe r Ie ve 1 0 f b u i I din g . <br /> <br />Adams said if shelter area.i II not be approved with the one exposed <br />wall, or if the'living quarters area i.s a problem, he'll go back <br />to the original plans submitted. <br /> <br />Council requested that net figures be provided to Counci I so <br />actual available standing room can be determined. <br /> <br />-5- <br />