Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br />Page th ree <br /> <br />March 17,1975 <br /> <br />Crichton suggested that if detention basins are required to adequateiy <br />retain water run-off, there should not be a need for spending these <br />extra dollars for pipes. <br /> <br />Anklan advised that, between Grey Fox Road and 1-694, the right-of-way <br />will necessari Iy encroach on the ditch area; no way the County can In- <br />crease width, without disrupting the ditch. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Hitchcock indicated, on an aerial map, some of the existing factors <br />affecting the'Rlce Creek Watershed area; advising that, after permit- <br />ted fluctuations in the Lake Johanna basin are determined, methods to <br />retard flows in excess of these levels must be devfsed which wlil least <br />change the lakes. He said additional retention basins may be needed, <br />as weli as pipes, and ditc~es to control flows. <br /> <br />Hitchcock agreed that filters wii I be needed, especially In Industrlai <br />areas, to trap grease, oi I, salt etc. from parking lots, which clog <br />natural ponding areas, as well as pipes. Hitchcock advised that the <br />Watershed District can sponsor acquisition of certain ponding areas for <br />preservation, and not be iimited by the municipal boundaries; can act <br />as a mediator for municipalities within the District, re al location of <br />costs, etc. <br /> <br />In response to Ramsey County's request for an expression from the Council <br />regarding the extent of the lexington Avenue up-grade considered ap- <br />propriate at this time, the foi lowing comments were made: <br /> <br />Crichton said that, If portion from County Road E to 1-694 is <br />needed now, he \~ould like a bike trail included on the east side <br />to serve the YMCA - seems reasonalbe to go to 1-694, with traffic <br />volumes of 6800 north of 1-694 and 7300 south of 1-694 to County <br />Road E. <br /> <br />Feyereisen also agreed that County Road E to 1-694 seems appro- <br />priate - If eventuaHy Intent is to up-grade to Highway 96, It <br />would be desirable to do it al I at one time. <br /> <br />Crepeau said that, If possible, entire project to Highway 96 <br />should be done now .- considers from County Road E to 1-694 to <br />be the minimum. <br /> <br />Wingert said he is hesitant about the portion between 1-694 and <br />Highway 96 - would like to receive some expression from Shoreview <br />before considering the up-grade of this portion of lexington - <br />agreed that portion from County Road E to i-694 seems practical <br />at this time. <br /> <br />Christoffersen stated that, even if the portion north of 1-694 Is not <br />Included in the Lexington Aven~e up-grade at this time, the drainage , <br />from this north ar-ea shouid be controlied to prevent Increase of run-off. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Crichton said that if an increased run-off is not allowed from this <br />north area, it does not seem necessary to anticipate an increase from <br />this area; therefore, we would not have to enlarde anything (pipe or <br />ponding areas) at this point. <br /> <br />Christoffereen noted that it is also possib'~ to have an lncrea$e <br />in run-off from the e~st of lexington; something will have to be done <br />to prevent an increased flow from this area. <br /> <br />After discussion, Feyereisen interpreted Counci I comments as encourage- <br />ment to Ramsey County to develop prel iminary plans for the up-grading <br />of Lexington Avenue, from County Road E to 1-694; some having expressed <br />desire for improvement all the way to Highway 96. <br /> <br />Ramsey County was requested by the Council to send copies of all mater- <br />ials relating to the lexington Avenue up-grade project, to Rice Creek <br />Watershed District, at the same time they are sent to the municipali- <br />ties, so reaction from Rice Creek Watershed can b~ coordinated with <br />those of Shorevlew and Arden Hills. <br /> <br />-3- <br />