CC 12-23-1974 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, f.jl NUTES OF SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Cecember 23, 1974 Page three Crepeau asked the 'ollo"wlng questions: How many In attendance tonight 1 ive in this Immediate area? (Abou t 15 hands .....ere raised,) How many are objecting to this operation? (About fShands I.ere raised.) Olmen sa I d,''rhe on I y roa Ily val:d argument, as I see i.t, Is the trucks in the neighborhood. I concur with restricTions recommended by the Planning Commission, )-0 which Ms. Nelson has agreed j'o comply. If she .follows these, I see no reason why this Special Use Permit should . not be approved. II Crichton read the Planning Commission recommendations, and the Publ Ie Safety Committee recommendations aloud. Wingert moved, seconded by Crichton, that the COline! I deny the appllcat!on for a Specl a i Use Permit requested by Ms. Nelson, 1~4 Edgewater Avenue, because: I. This occupation does not meet the definition of "Home Occu- pation" as defined by Ordinance No. 99, in that this occupa- tion i s Int1matety connected with a construction business, I<h i ch has the pvtential of gene rat i ng truck traffic that is 'roo exce ss i ve for a resldentiaJ.area, 2. There is significant resident opposition TO the issuance of this Special Use Perm it. 3. The recommendation from the Public Safety CommIttee the t a safety hazard can occur because of the nature and consTruc- t; on of '~he s1'reets in the general area, Streets are not built to allow for much truck traffic, which i s IndIcaTed as a natural part of This business. Motion carried (WIngert, Crichton, Crepeau voting In favor of the motion; Olmen, Feyereisen voting in opposiTion). REPORT OF VILLAGE ATTORNEY JAMES LYNDEN AmendmenT to Ordinance No. 67 r,; Annual Dog Reglstrat;o~~ Lynden read - the Ol-d i nance In its entirety, and after disCuSSion, Crichton moved that Council appi-ove, as amended, AN ORDINANCE AMEND- ING ORD. NC. I I , RELATING TO THE REGISTRATION, IDENTIFICATION AND KEEPING OF DOGS, AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED, BY CHANGING THE REGISTRATION FEE REQUIRED THEREIN, REMOVING ~HE REQUIREMENT OF VETERINARIAN'S CERTIFICATE FOR SPAYED DOGS, SUBSTITUTING "CITY" FOR "V ILLAGE" , THROUGHOUT, AND INCREASING PENALTIES PROVIDED THEREIN, and authorize its pub! ication and execution br the Mayor and Clerk Adm In i strator. . Motion was seconded by Feyerelsen and carried ullanlmously. Amendmeni' to Ordinance No. 132 re SerVice Station Underqround Tanks LynderTr:ea.:t the erd j naf1C"e" In j t~'EiiI t i rei'y . - - -- . In discussion, concern wa~; expn'.ssed re the provision for n"rerilpora ryu immobi lizatlon of undergo~nd tarks. Crichton moved thaT alternativo A ( i nc Iud I ng I and 2) be deleted; re- number 8 as A and C as 13; substitute the word ".i.wo~' for Itthree"" . Motion was seconded by Feyereisen and carried unanimously. I n fu rthsr rev i e\1 of the ordinance draft, concern was expressed re the definition of "vacant" ( when I s a staTion considered to be vacant?) Feyereisen moved~ seconded by Crichton, that Council adoption of the ordinance be tabled to +he Council meeting of December 30, 1974, pend- Ing redraf"!" of the oi-d i nance, as discussed, and the inciusion of a de.f i n i " i on of 'lvacanotll by the Vi Ilage Attorney. Motion carrlad Unani- mously. -3- ----