My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2025 JDA Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
03-17-2025 JDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2025 4:20:28 PM
Creation date
4/9/2025 4:19:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Waiver Request Form – Proposed Design <br />The requirements of the guidelines may be modified by the JDA only for reasons of hardship. Hardship includes the inability <br />to physically achieve the standard due to circumstances unique to the property. Economic reasons alone do not constitute <br />a hardship. Approved modifications must show demonstrable and quantifiable progress towards the Green Energy Vision. <br />Acceptable <br />· Full Waiver – Programmatic: conflict with the intended use of the project <br />· Full Waiver – Technological: limitation of available technologies or methodologies <br />· Provisional Exemptions: Pass-through to the next phase for guidelines without enough information to determine <br />compliance <br /> <br />Waiver type <br />(Full or <br />Provisional) <br />Guideline number Reason <br />(Programmatic, <br />Technological, <br />or Pass- <br />Through) <br />Describe request for modification and how the project will remain in <br />harmony with the intent of the sustainability guidelines <br />Provisional <br />Waiver <br />2.1 Sustainability <br />Certification <br />Pass-Through This waiver requests to delay the decision for pursuing LEED <br />certification for the proposed project until a later stage. Representative <br />scorecards have been provided for reference of both anticipated points <br />that the proposed design may achieve, as well as a scorecard that shows <br />a path to Silver using the representative features of the Sustainable <br />Design Guidelines that are outside of the scope of the proposed design. <br />The challenge with achieving LEED certification at even a Certified level <br />for this project is two-fold; there are both limitations on available points <br />to pursue based on location at the current time (such as density & transit <br />access, bicycle paths) and the manufacturing typology (such as thermal <br />comfort, daylight, & views). Collectively, more than 15% of the 110 total <br />points are unachievable for this project which means more credits must <br />be achieved in other categories. Further time will allow the project team <br />to work with the County’s sustainability consultant on better <br />understanding the location-based credits’ viability as the greater Rice <br />Creek Commons development proceeds, and to further advance <br />understanding of credits possible from the tenant build-out. At a later <br />stage, the project team will also be able to confirm whether there are <br />remaining fees in the County’s land reduction budget available to cover <br />the soft costs associated with the pursuit of LEED certification, but at this <br />time it is anticipated that the value of that reduction is entirely needed <br />to cover the cost of the ground-source heat exchange system and <br />associated equipment premiums. <br />Full Waiver 2.2.1 Energy <br />Efficiency <br />Technological This wavier requests to lower the required efficiency percentage from <br />50% to 25%. Through energy modeling conducted by the tenant MEP <br />Engineering team, multiple HVAC system options have been evaluated <br />and while one all-electric ground-source coupled option does <br />demonstrate that 50% is achievable, the initial cost premium and <br />payback period for that option is not favorable to this project’s <br />conditions. <br /> <br />The team proposes the lowered goal above in alignment with the current <br />energy model results of the proposed design (highlighted in green on the <br />Energy & Carbon Results table), with a buffer to allow for further
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.