Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 10. 1997 2 <br />. MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as <br /> submitted and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein, <br /> The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> Mayor Probst invited those present to come forward and address Council on any item not already <br /> on the agenda, There were no public comments. <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. Ramsey County Discussion, Jim Tolaas, Arden Manor Mobile Home Park <br /> Mayor Probst explained that Jim Tolaas, Ramsey County Public Works, was present to review <br /> the status and design options being considered for Highway 96. Specifically, the segment of <br /> Highway 96 from Highway 10 to 1-35W, It was noted that residents of Arden Manor Mobile <br /> Home Park had been invited to attend the meeting, <br /> Mr. Tolaas stated he wanted to present three proposals and explained that Gary Erickson, BRW, <br /> would be attending to present a roll-out map addressing a bridge at Highway 10. <br />. It was determined to delay further discussion until Mr. Erickson was present. <br /> B. Planning Cases <br /> 1. Case #97-23, Site Plan Modification - Sign Relocation, Manufacturer's <br /> Service, U.S. Operations (MS), 4300 Round Lake Road <br /> Mr. Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director, explained that Manufacturer's Service <br /> (MS) is requesting approval of a modification of the Site Plan approval which was granted in <br /> Planning Case #96-12 to facilitate the relocation of a wall sign to a new location. He explained <br /> that a special requirement of the Gateway Business District provides for approval of the location, <br /> type, size and design of signs within the Gateway Business District. The original signage <br /> provided for one sign band to either side of the building's five points of entrance for a total often <br /> wall signs. The original signage was planned for occupancy of the building by multiple tenants, <br /> however, the building is solely occupied by MS. MS currently has no wall signs on their <br /> building, so the applicant has not utilized any of the available signage that was originally <br /> provided for. The applicant's request is to locate a wall sign in the upper left hand comer of the <br /> building's west wall which would provide exposure to 1-35W. <br /> Mr. Ringwald advised that the Planning Commission, at their November 5, 1997 meeting, <br /> recommended approval of the proposed modification to the sign location (wall sign), based on <br /> the rationale that the proposed modification does not negatively affect the aesthetics of the <br />. buildings and tbat the other ten wall sign locations will not be utilized, subject to the size of the <br /> wall sign on the west face not exceeding the amount allowed by the Sign Ordinance (100 square <br /> feet), <br />