My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 11-10-1997
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CC 11-10-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:51 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 3:22:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 10.1997 3 <br />. Mr. Ringwald added that the applicant had requested that they be allowed to keep the potential <br /> for one additional sign at the northeast (visitors) entrance without having to come hack through <br /> the Planning Commission/City Council review process. He commented that, given the extent of <br /> the original signage that was approved, it would seem appropriate to allow for two wall signs on <br /> this structure, each of which would be 100 square feet or less in area. <br /> Councilmember Malone inquired regarding the rationale for the sign request on the northeast <br /> corner. <br /> Tom Brunmeier, Facilities Manager of Manufacturer's Service, explained the east end of the <br /> building is all office and the warehouse/factory is to the west. They have designed and built a <br /> main visitor entrance, but have not yet opened the entrance. They don't intend to install the sign <br /> at this point, but want the ability to erect the sign at the visitors entrance without having to come <br /> back for another approvaL Mr. Brunmeier explained that the sign will not be lighted and will <br /> contain the company logo and lettering. He stated he is unsure of the exact size but it will be <br /> comparable to the sign on the other end of the building with black acrylic lettering and green ball <br /> which is their standard logo. <br /> Councilmember Hicks asked if the signs will exceed 100 square feet each, Mr, Brunmeier stated <br /> I <br /> that neither sign will exceed 100 square feet. He clarified that when the City approved the entire <br /> building, a sign was approved on that elevation and he wants to retain that approval without <br />. having to reapply in the future, Mr. Brunmeier reported that the company is now incorporated <br /> and the owners have changed their name. <br /> MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #97- <br /> 23, Manufacturer's Service, V.S, Operations (MS), 4300 Round Lake Road, for a <br /> sign relocation as recommended by the Planning Commission to allow for two <br /> wall signs (west wall and northeast wall). <br /> It was noted that the 100 square foot restriction is not being included in the motion since it is a <br /> Code requirement. <br /> In response to Councilmember Malone, Mr. Brunmeier reviewed the types of directional signage <br /> they will utilize and eXplained that none will be erected until the street work is completed. Mr. <br /> Ringwald explained that directional signage can be approved administratively. <br /> Councilmember Malone inquired regarding the situation should this tenant sublease to other <br /> tenants who need additional signage. <br /> Mr. Brunmeier stated he understands another permit would be required and indicated that it is not <br /> their intention to sublease space to another tenant since they will need the space for expansion, <br />. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.