My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 08-31-1998
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CC 08-31-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:54 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 3:22:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 31. i998 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone asked if there is a provision for an emergency overflow. Mr. Vesterholt <br />stated there will be, as required by the Code. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if the sidewalk extends toward the north of the canopy. Ms. <br />Sterner stated the sidewalk from the parking lot will connect to the entryway sidewalk and it <br />could be minimized by incorporating grass. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski requested a general overview of the plan and building interior. Ms. <br />Sterner explained the modifications made since the last time thc plan was presented to add more <br />grass area around the building and patio area. Mr. Vesterholt advised that very few existing trees <br />would be lost. <br /> <br />Ms. Sterner presented the interior building plan, noting the Council Chambers and lobby face the <br />lake view. She pointed out the location of the fireplace and adjacent reception area to the City <br />offices. Ms. Sterner then presented the upper level area containing four additional closed City <br />staff offices, community room, and storage. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if an additional staircase is included. Mr. Fritsinger explained there does not <br />appear to be a feasible way to place an additional staircase since it takes up too much interior <br />space if located in the middle, or would have to be placed toward the outside as a Fire Code stair <br />case. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if the stairwell must be enclosed for Fire protection. Mr. <br />Vesterholt stated since three floors are being connected, it must be an enclosed wall. <br />Councilmember Larson asked if a glass wall could be used for separation to create more of an <br />open area. Mr. Vesterholt suggested he study whether the Fire Code would allow that option. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger asked the Council to consider the issue related to NSP overhead lines. Currently <br />there is an underground line on TCAAP which is in need of replacement. After meeting with <br />NSP, the company has elected to look at an overhead line along the north side of Highway 96, <br />the west side of Lexington Avenue, and then along County Road I. He asked if the Council <br />believes there will be a significant impact with an overhead line or if staff should discuss the <br />option of underground, possibly at the City's cost. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she thought that NSP had to do as the customer requests. Mr. <br />Fritsinger stated they will, at the City's cost, which is estimated at $40,000 to $60,000. It was <br />noted that NSP believes underground utilities cost more in maintenance. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he understands staff has expended a lot of time and ellort to work with NSP, <br />but he does not believe NSP will in-kind this additional cost. He stated he believes an overhead <br />line is inappropriate and the City should continue to investigate undergrounding these lines. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated this is high voltage transmission lines which they do not like to <br />place underground. Mr. Ringwald stated this is correct and involves distribution lines. <br />Councilmember Malone noted this type of line would be at a higher elevation. Mr. Ringwald <br />stated one alternate that exists would be to duplicate the south side of Highway 96, but NSP <br />indicated they don't like to do that and would prefer keeping the lines separated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.