My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-14-1998
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CC 09-14-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:54 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 3:22:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEl\1BER 14 1998 <br />, <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Case #98-23, Variance, H20 Karth Lake Drive <br /> <br />Ms, Randall eXplained the applicant is requesting approval of a side yard-street setback variance <br />(27 feet proposed, when 40 feet is required) for a three season porch addition on a single family <br />lot zoned R-1, Secondly, in the event that the house is destroyed, they would like to ask for a <br />variance allowing the existing home to be rebuilt in its current location, <br /> <br />Ms. Randall reviewed the staff report, noting the proposed three season porch is 13 feet 6 inches <br />by 14 feet 6 inches (196 square feet), The applicant had evaluated other locations for the porch <br />addition, however, this is the only location they feel will work with the existing home. The house <br />currently has a side yard-street setback of27 feet, where 40 feet is required, The house was built <br />when the zoning ordinance allowed a 20 foot setback. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Case #98-23 - Variance for a <br />Corner Side Yard Setback for the three season porch. They did not recommend approval of the <br />house variance, They also included two additional conditions: the variance is to include only the <br />three season porch, and the variance would expire if the porch loses its legal nonconforming <br />status. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if the face of the porch would line up with the existing side ofthe house, <br /> <br />Ms, Randall stated it would, <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone asked for verification on the Commission's amendment whether the <br />variance would expire ifthe house lost its legal nonconforming status, <br /> <br />Ms, Randall indicated that the variance would expire if the house lost its legal nonconforming <br />status, <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve Planning Case #98-23, Variance for side yard-street setback for <br />the three season porch (27 feet proposed when 40 feet is required) based on the <br />"Corner Side Yard Setback Variance (house and attached porch)" section of the <br />staff report dated August 25, 1998, The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />B. Resolution #98-60, Adopting the Preliminary 1999 Budget <br /> <br />Mr. Post noted the preliminary 1999 budget contains four significant items occurring now, They <br />include: <br /> <br />Utilizing the maximum allowable levy ($1,923,937) to achieve a balanced General Fund <br />budget. <br /> <br />Assuming that the new City Hall construction begins in 1999 with funding coming from <br />Advance Refunding Bonds Fund No, 315 ($1,100,000) and Municipal Land & Buildings <br />Fund No, 408 ($950,000), <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.