My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 12-14-1998
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CC 12-14-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:55 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 3:22:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - DECEMBER 14,1998 9 <br /> utilities for future capital needs may strain those finances. Mr. Post stated that the City has been <br />. notified by the City of Roseville ofa 3% increase in the wholesale cost of water in 1999, which <br /> matches the increase of the City's internal cost of operations and labor agreements. Also, needed <br /> capital improvements are significant: an up sizing of the waterline for the West Round Lake <br /> Road Phase II project, and the replacement of one-half of the residential water meters which will <br /> start in 1999, <br /> Mr. Post advised that the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division (MCES) has <br /> become more cost efficient and notified the City of a 5% decrease in treatment costs for 1999 and <br /> a corresponding decrease in the year 2000 as well. He stated that MCES treatment costs reflect <br /> approximately 60% of the operating costs of the utility. The remaining 40% of the utility's <br /> operating costs will experience cost increases in the 2.0% to 3,0% range. Weighing these two <br /> factors, Staff would suggest that a 2% rate decrease would be appropriate. He reviewed the <br /> anticipated capital improvements. <br /> Mr. Post stated that one other area city has a senior rate program (Roseville). The Arden Hills <br /> senior sewer rate represents a 50% reduction of the typical residential flat-rate fee. The <br />.- residential base rate for 1998 is $53.95 per quarter with a senior paying $26,95 per quarter. He <br /> advised that it has been consistent that the amount of water consumption of seniors on the senior <br /> rate is close to 66% to 67% less than residential consumers. Mr, Post stated that the existing <br /> 50% senior rate reduction does not have a basis in being tied to any criteria and suggested that <br /> the amount of reduction be tied to parallel what is being consumed and to phase in a rate increase <br />. for senior rate customers over the next three years. Then, in 200 I, it will end up at a two-thirds <br /> rate which parallels consumption rates, <br /> Mr. Post stated that the surface water management utility has been able to fund its capital <br /> improvement projects but in looking at the number of streets that need to be reconstructed that do <br /> not have a sanitary sewer system, the capital demands will be increasing. <br /> Mayor Probst inquired regarding the process for adoption, He stated that he agrees with Staff s <br /> recommendations but is concerned this agenda came out on Friday and has not allowed a process <br /> for public comments, particularly as it relates to the senior rate increase, Mr. Post stated that the <br /> past process involved a Council discussion and not necessarily a public hearing. <br /> Mayor Probst stated that he is not suggesting a fonnal public hearing but he believes there may <br /> be strong opinions voiced on both sides, <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski stated that her last bill was $187 and when she started it was $47, <br /> However, no one asked her how she felt out about the increases, She stated that this is a City <br /> issue based on costs, so she has a concern about singling out the seniors and allowing a different <br /> process for them, She inquired regarding the process to receive the senior rate, Mr. Post stated <br /> that it is an age (65 years of age) or disability consideration for the primary home owner. Proof <br /> of age or disability is required to start the process. <br />. Councilmember Aplikowski inquired regarding whether both residents need to be of that age. <br /> Mr. Post stated that only one resident needs to be of that age. <br /> --- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.