My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 08-23-1976
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
CC 08-23-1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:59 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 3:46:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />MR. CHIRSTOFFERSEN: The project consists of the construc- <br />tion of sanitary sewer, watermain ODd street facilities. <br />Indian Oaks 2 Addition is north of Indian Oaks Addition on <br />this location on the map. Construction consists of watexmain <br />along James Avenue and along Indian Oaks couxt, sanitary sewer <br />on Indian oaks Couxt, and street construction for James Avenue <br />and Indian Oaks Court. The total cost of the project to be <br />assessed was 100%. We Qriginally estimated this assessment <br />to be $56,502.81. The original assessment was based on <br />estimated construction costs.. Since then we have rece!ved the <br />final payment so we could reduce the assessments. originally, <br />Mr. Feyereisen requested that they be assessed on a benefitteQ <br />basis - take the total number and divide by the total number <br />of lots. However, there were four lots that he wanteQ assessed <br />differently. He said to place a maximum of $4,100 on the l~s <br />shown with the orange dots and the lots shown with the green <br />dots he requested be assessed $4,900.70. The reason for this <br />was to get a balance. In other words, we took the lots he <br />wanted to assess the $4,100 and subtracteQ from the total and <br />divided the remaining lots which (inaudible) was left over. <br />We are not placing an assessment on Lot NO.5. That's where <br />the pond is. The adjustment of $333.00 distributed against <br />three different lots as directed by Mr. Feyereisen would be $111 <br />less on Lot 7, Block 1 and Lots 2 and 3 of Block 2 so their <br />assessment would be less than $4,100.00. The three lots of <br />$4,900.JO were not sold at the time the assessment was placed <br />and the people puxchased those lots knowing that the asssssment <br />would be that amount on t.lotose lots. 'l'hat concludes my portion. <br />I will be happy to answer allY questions. <br /> <br />MAYOR CREPEAU: Any questions? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CRICmONI You said the lots at $4,900 were <br />not sold at the time you set that figure? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: That's correct. At the time we were <br />working on it those lots were not sold and since they have been <br />sold - myunderetanding is they were sold knOWing that was what <br />the assessment would be. <br /> <br />COUNCILNAIl' CRICB'l'ON: How many lots were there? <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: Fourteen lots. <br /> <br />MAYOR CREPEAU: Any other questions? If not, Mr. peter <br />popovich, would you please explain the fiscal matters. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the council. I met. <br />with the engineer and Mr. Feyereisen when the assessment details <br />were being worked out and as was indicated to you, the original <br />cost was $56.502.81 and the $333 which bas now been firmed up <br />can be deducted. There's a total of 13 lots - nine at $4,100 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.