Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~., .' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />.-. <br /> <br />to be satisfactory and was directed to be filed by the Clerk <br /> <br />Administrator. <br /> <br />The city consulting engineer and fiscal consultant each <br /> <br />respectively discussed the proposed improvement. <br /> <br />them were as follows: <br /> <br />MR. MICHAEL SHEEHY, 4455 Arden View Court: Hasn't had <br />any problems with sanitary sewer or water service. Asked why <br />this improvement was being proposed to give him better service. <br />Mr. Christoffersen replied that the utilities are being installed <br />to facilitate the construction of a road. It involves the <br />extension of sewer and water services away from the roadway so <br />if the road is constructed it won't be necessary to tear it up <br />again to construct underground utilities. Mr. Sheehy suggested <br />that Hamline Avenue would never be a throughway because of the <br />location of the arms plant,and that he doesn't want a throughway. <br />Felt that the maintenance on a four lane road would be as much <br />as maintenance on the road with just an overlay. Thought it <br />would be cheaper to overlay the road every five years than put <br />in the four lane road. <br /> <br />MR. ARTHUR ERICKSON, 1298 Nursery Hill Lane: Hamline <br />Avenue already has six to 10 inches of overlay and he thought <br />it was wrong to tear that up and start over again. Sees no <br />reason for a storm sewer in the area. Said he didn't understand <br />the difference between the overlay and the $250,000 project. <br />(Alternate 4 - 24 foot road.) Mr. Christoffersen replied that. <br />in some places the present road has an overlay of only four <br />inches, and there is practically no base under the bituminous <br />paving. The road that's proposed would have a good sub-section <br />far exceeding what's in now. <br /> <br />MR. ARTHUR LINDBERG, 4435 Arden View court: Lives in the <br />pemtom Village. Asked how the assessments would be determined <br />for those who live in the townhouses. Mr. Popovich replied that <br />probably the Pemtom frontage on Hamline Avenue would be assessed, <br />which would then be divided among the units. <br /> <br />DR. ROBERT A.LEVIT, 4444 Arden View Court: Asked three <br />questions. (1) Asked what the completion times were for the <br /> <br />2 <br />