My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 11-23-1981
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CC 11-23-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:01 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:09:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, . <br /> Minutes of Specisl Council Meeting Nov. 23, 1981 <br /> Answe r: 7 or 8/year; signal did reduce the number <br /> of accidents by about 50% at Lydia. <br /> Resident said he feels the need for something to de crease the <br /> speed on 51; feels signsls with turn arrows would resolve the <br /> problem, <br /> In discussion, Robinson was asked if plsn can be modified to <br /> create acceleration lanes; asked if closing the exis ting crossing <br /> will cause a safety problem for joggers. Robinson .aid extensive <br /> plan modification would send it back for re-study; does not think <br /> acceleration lanes will be acceptalle because they do not meet the <br /> standards. and would not allow the lane-cross for left turns <br /> Robinson said the existing access would be sodded snd rebuilt; <br />. feels joggers will follow the roads. Robinson said the raised con- <br /> crete islandS at the "T" intersections will have breskaway signs; <br /> noted that the City may, if it desires, instigate a change of speed <br /> by reques ting the State to conduct a speed survey; aurvey will <br /> determine reasonable speed (noraally the speed traveled by 85% of <br /> vehicles). <br /> McAllister moved, seconded by Hollenhorst, that Council adopt <br /> Resolution No. 81-82. APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY LAYOUT NO. 1 . S.P. <br /> 6216-87. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> REPORT OF VILLAGE ENGINEER DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN <br /> Bids for Improvement No. P-81-1. Grey Fox Road <br /> Christoffersen referred Council to his letter of 11-23-81. and to <br /> attached bid tabulation of the eight bids received; recommended <br /> award of bid to the low bidder at $203,042.50. <br /> Christoffersen explained that the bid includes: <br /> -36' wide street. curb face to curb faee <br /> -concrete curb and gutter <br /> -ca tch basins <br /> -9 ton load bituminous street and rsilroad crossing <br /> Christoffersen explained that the fessibility report estimste in- <br /> 1(Jluded railroad crossin'~Dals which are not needed, . . y <br /> he Engineer'a eatimate260.000; noted that City h.s 40 days <br /> to award the bid. <br /> " <br /> Council concurred that, if the project is approved. it will award <br /> the bid to the low bidder aa recommended. <br /> County Road E. Walkway and Median Island Plans <br /> Transparencies were shown of the modified median island plana. <br /> Christofferaen noted the changes from the initial proposal. <br /> In discussion of the pedestrian/bike walk plan, Chris toffe rsen <br /> said the north side haa no t been change.; 6' wide walk will ex- <br /> tend from Connelly to Lexington in front of Flaherty's, the service <br /> Itation and St. Psul Book to Carroll's Furniture. then will be seg- <br /> mented using driveways where necessary; both north and south 1 ". ~,JMH-A_~ <br />. will be a minimum of 8' from curb to provide for snow storage; <br /> north walk is the City's responSibility. south walk is County bike <br /> path. , <br /> Christoffersen described the mouth walk as a 8' wide straight-line <br /> walk proposed to be 75% state funded. <br /> In discussion, it was noted that a meandering gravel walk was <br /> previously envisioned on the south side of County Rd. E. <br /> Christoffersen explained that a straight-line walk paral!eling <br /> the utility easement is proposed because of the terrain and need <br /> for 8' - 10' snow storsge area between the walk and curb. It was <br /> also suggested that a gravel walk cannot be shoveled. <br /> . <br /> In discuasion of walk maintenance, it was the general concensua <br /> that the walk maintenance would be the reaponsibility of the ad- <br /> jacent property owners, as in other communities. <br /> -3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.