CC 09-28-1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Ninutes of Regular Council Meeting Sept. 28, 1981 Case No. 81-23, P_~..!.!.E'J3_ary_!la t_~..f...!:.r.~~_~Oa.~--",-_a.E'.~r~.'i.~~,s t to Install Improvemen ts and Vacate Streets Council was referred to Planning Memo (9-23-81) and Council was referred to the revised Pre limin a ry Plat of Arden Oaks incorporat- ing the modifications req ue s t e d by Council: 1. A 1.5 acre park in B lock 3. 2 . A turn-around easement on Lot 21, Block 3, and 3. Hodification of road alignment to eliminate sliver of 1 and extending south from Lot 2 , Block 2. Af te r review of the planning COmments and d i s C us R i on , Johnson moved, seconded by Wingert, that Council app rove the Preliminary Plat of Arden Oaks (9-24-81 revised) as submitted, subject to: 1. Comments of the ri to' Planner (m[!mo of 9-28-81) . 2. Approval of Ci to' Attorney 3. Final grading plan approval by the City Engineer 4. Vacation of previously platted streets as nec2ssary. Notion carried unanimously (5-0) . llcNiesh reported receipt of Petition from lOa? of property owners of Arden Oaks On September 14th reque.s ting City installation of streets and utilities. It was noted that the feasibility study will include more than P rden Oaks in o rde r to bring uti li ties to the plat. In discussion, it Has noted th a t authorizing preparation of the feasibility study is a cODlmitment that Council intends to proceed. Ch ri s tof fe rsen s ug ge s te d th a t the Ci to' en te r into fin agreement with the developer th at developer will pay engineering,legal etc. eos ts, if he does not pursue the project. Lauphinghouse referred Council to letter (9-25-81) offering to reimburse the Ci to' for expenses necessary to process the A,rden Oaks plat. Hollenhorst moved, seconded by Hingert, th a t round,l ndop t P2 s- olution No. 81-68, ilLT)lORIZHH; PFEP/,Ft,TION OF TIlL FEASIBILITY Sn'DY FOR n;p paVE VENT 81-3 (up to and including Arden Oaks) . Motion carried unanimously (5-0). (Engineer and pttorney to draft a developer's agreBT!len t for Council's consideration.) 1982 Budget Cbairman Torn Eulcahy referre.d Council to the recommendations of the Finance Committee relative to the proposed 1982 Budget (I'in- utes of Finance Committee ~'e"ting of 9-10-81) and noted the sup- gested changes on transparencies of Sumrr,aries of Expenditure) Fevenue and ~'e ans of Financing the 1982 Budget. Hulcahy noted tha t the> budge t. as proposed, t'cpr.e.sen ts an [) ~: in- ere as e over 1980 expenditures which results in an estimated 8.324 mi 11 levy. Council expressed its appreciation to Chairman }fulcahy and the . Finance Committee for their work an(l recommendations. Cse of Fed,eral Pe ven ue Sharinr, Funds .-....-"-.-, HcAllister moved) seconded by llollenhorst th at Council approve the Cse of Federal revenue Sharing Funds as revised and recommended by the Fin ance Commi t tee, as follows: Ordinance Cadi fi ca ti on $ 600 Government Buildings 4,500 Public Safety Car Replacement 7,000 Pub 11 c Works) t--rfscellaneous Equipment 7,600 Parks, Ground l-!aster and o th e r ~Jiscellaneous 12,665 Niscellaneous Equipment Park s . Summer PI ayground Program 6,480 Park s , Skating Pinks _---2.....!22.- $44,000 Hotion carried unanimously. -11-