CC 06-29-1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, . . Minutes of Regular Council Meeting June 29, 1981 along the west side, separating the westerly lot from the residentially zoned Village-owned property. Miller noted that an access-egress easement is shown 12' on each side of a line across the proposed lots (parallel to Highway 96) to accomplish 24' wide road access across the lots and accommodate parking. Steve Hage described the ponding area proposed at the northeast corner of the plat; Miller noted that a drainage study will be prepared to support the final plat for approval of RCWD and the City Engineer. Wingert moved, seconded by Hollenhorst, that Council approve the Preliminary Plat of Arden Hills Corporate Center (Case No. 81-16) as amended (6-29-81), aubject to satisfaction of the park dedication. In further discussion, Miller noted that the Center may be final platted in phases; park dedication could be required at preliminary plat stage for enti2e parcel, or as each phase is final platted. Motion carried unanimously. (McAllister, Woodburn, Hage scheduled a meeting re park dedication negotiations on Thursday, July 2, at 8:00 a.m. at the Village Hall.) l' Ordinance Interpretation re Ham Radio HeiRhts Council was referred to Zehm's memo of 6-23-81 relative to a ham radio tower at 3538 Siems Court, approximately 35 ft in height.. Miller referred Council to Ordinance 213, height require- ments for accessory structures (Section VI A.2. Height) and Section VI B.3. Height Exce.tions), noting that it is his interpretation that the ham tower, which is attached to tbe prinCipal structure, could be 39' in height (4' over the limiting height of buildings in tbe R-l District). Mr. Roger Moerke noted that he bas 66' trees on his property; tower ia 35' high. After discussion, Council concurred with Miller's interpreta- tion of the intent of the ordinance and determined that no variance is needed. Case No. 80-7, Request for Time Extension on Variance - Kirk Johnson Council was referred to Kirk Johnson's letter of 6-26-81, requesting a time extension on a variance, approved 3-31-80, for a deck 40' from the highwater mark (35' variance). In review of the plan presented (Case No. 80-7), it was noted that the deck proposal was 10' wide; applicant is now requesting a 14' wide deck. Mr. Jobnson said he didn't recall the deck width; noted that bis shoreline meanders- not sure of measurement from the lake. Winge rt tbe 35' ma rk) . moved, seconded by Hollenhorst, that Council extend setback variance for 6 months (40' from high water Motion carried unanimously. (Building Inspector to verify measurements from high water 'mark. ) -3-