My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-29-1981
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CC 06-29-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:01 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:09:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, . <br /> <br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br /> <br />June 29, 1981 <br /> <br />Wingert moved, seconded by Hollenhorst, that Council <br />accept Karth Lake West Improvement No. 78-3, and authorize <br />Final Payment in the amount of $8,171.67 to Robert W. Moore <br />Company. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 81-44, Awarding Bid for Improvement No. P-80-l, <br />Project B, County Road E Street LightinR <br />Council was referred to tabulation of eight bids received <br />and to Christoffersen's letter of June 29, 1981, recommending <br />acceptance of the low bid, $69,818.85 with a deduct alternate <br />of $43.00 if steel light poles are used instead of concrete. <br />Christoffersen reported approval of the plans by MnDot. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Christoffersen showed Council a sample of the brown concrete <br />terrazo post material; noted that dark bronze steel is the <br />alternate. In discussion, it waa noted that most of County <br />Road E buainesa placea have used the dark bronze ateel; <br />concern has been to establish continuity along the street; <br />may be defeating this purpose if the City selects the <br />concrete post. It was auggested that a sample of the bronze <br />steel also be obtained for comparison purposes. <br /> <br />Hollenhorst moved, aeconded by Wingert, that Council adopt <br />Resolution No. 81-44, Awarding Bid for Improvement No. P-80-l, <br />Project B, County Road E Street Lighting, to People's Electric <br />at a coat of $69,818.85 with a deduct alternate of $43.00. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />~ <br />Resolution No. 81-45, Approving Plans and Specifications <br />and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Improvement <br />No. ST-8l-2, Lexington/694 Storm Drainage <br />Christoffersen briefly reviewed alterations from the former <br />presentstion; noted thst he proposes to also review the <br />alterations with property owners on whoae properties some <br />of the work will occur (Land O'LakeB snd Tri State Land Co.). <br /> <br />Council discussed the advantages and disadvantages of holding <br />the assessment hearing on estimsted costs vs actual cost, <br />after project has been completed. <br /> <br />McNiesh noted that if bonds are sold this fall, City eould <br />have the money by November which could be invested until <br />needed ss construction proceeds; if project is completed <br />in 1982, assessments could be levied for collection with <br />taxes in 1983. <br /> <br />Council concurred to hold the assessment hearing after the <br />bid is let and construction is under way. . <br /> <br />Wingert moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council adopt <br />Resolution No. 81-45, Resolution Approving Plans and Speci- <br />fications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for <br />Improvement No. ST-8l-2, Lexington/694 Storm Drainage, Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />(Bid opening to be on July 31st at 2:00 p.m.) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Christoffersen reported that plans for the portion of <br />project being constructed by MnDot have been submitted <br />review by the City; estimated City's share of the cost <br />this project is $37,500.00 <br /> <br />the <br />for <br />of <br /> <br />OTHER BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case No. 81-16, Arden Hills Corporate Center, <br />Preliminary Plst. <br />Planner Miller referred Council to a revised plan of the <br />prpposed Arden Hills Corporate Center, prepared to resolve <br />issues discussed previously, providing a 20' wide OutlOt A <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.