CC 09-29-1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Regular Counci I Meeting September 29, 1980 Page three It was explained that $9,000 Is considered a more realistic cost estimate for Installation of one siren. After determining that there were no further comments from the floor, the Publ ic Hearing was recessed unt i I after approval of the 1981 Budget. REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER ORLYN MILLER Case No. 80-34, Rezonln!j from 1-2 to B-2 - Mote I Site Miller explained that the Applicant I s requesting the rezoning of the 2.8 acre parcel west of the Town Crier site (Lexington and Red Fox Road) from 1-2 to B-2 to accommodate the development of an economy motor hote I which is permitted only i n the B-2 . District. Clerk Administrator McNlesh reported that Mr. Cossack, Blue Fox Inc. , ca II ed to advise that he favors the rezoning; no other comments have been rece I ved. Woodburn moved, seconded by Crichton, that Counci I approve the rezoning of the 2.8 acre parcel from 1-2 to B-2 and authorize Attorney Lynden to prepare the necessary documents to effect the rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. Miller referred Counci I to a transparency depicting the motel site and to his report of 8-27-80 and to the Planning Commission recommendations (Minutes of 9/25/80) . In rev I ew of the site plan, Mi Iler noted that 66 units are p ro- posed In the phase I configuration as indicated; plantings at the rear (north) oft he site wi II be included I n phase I. Miller noted that the proposed parking meets ordinance req u I rements; no provision Is made for part-time employee parking, but It i s felt that the gene ra I parking will be sufficient. Miller noted that a drive Is proposed to extend across the re a r 0 f the first phase structure. The App II cant reported that the grading plans have been reviewed by RCWD but have not been finally approved to date. Engineer Christoffersen noted that he wi I I need detai led grading plans; has received the grading schematic. Miller advised that the plan meets a I I setback and other minimum requl rements; noted that the Planning Commission expressed concern re certain code requl rements (handicapped, sound proof- ing, etc.) Applicant Chute rep II ed that his architect feels there will be no soundproofing problems as proposed; sound- proofing Is also a concern of motel management. Chute showed a sample of the exterior 4" x I 2" End i co tt b rl ck proposed for the exterior of the motel, and a lighting fixture b roch u re depicting the style of lighting to be used on the ex- terior of the bur Idlng and on standards; descrl bed the lighting as "down light" sufficient for security, not bright. . After discussion, Woodburn moved, seconded by Hanson, that Counci I approve the Bui Idlng Permit for the motel, subject to: I. Bui Iding Plan approval by the Fire Chief. 2. Landscape Plan and Lighting Plan approval by the City Planner, and re ce I p t 0 f Performance Bond In the amount of 125% of the cost of landscaping, prior to occupancy. 3. ResolutIon of park dedication prior to occupancy. 4. Drainage plan and ut II i ty connection plan approval by the City Engineer. Motion carried unan imously. -3-