CC 05-12-1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, Minutes of Regular Council Meeting Pa;]e Two May 12, 1980 Miller reported that applicant hes;changed his request; now prefers to split off Lot #4 instead of Lot #2. Wiugert noted that a master plan for subdivision of the property is on file; moved that Council approve the split of Lot #4, as per the sketch plan. Motion was seconded by Crichton and carried unanimously. . It was noted that utilities to serve this lot are pending develop" ment of the Arden Oaks plat; acre-sized lots are required for private sewer (septic tank/drain field) in areas not served by municipal sewer, unless it can be demonstrated that smaller lot will not result in any contamination of the soil, ground water or anything else that might endanger the public health. (No word relative to pursuing the Arden Oaks plat to date). Dunnett was advised that separate applications would be required for each lot split proposed (as per sketch plan) and that property eventually may he subject to p~rk dedication. Case No.~12, Lot Split - Griffis Property Miller referred Council to the proposed 2-parcel subdivision of the Griffis, Inc. industrial property on the west side of Round Lake, south of Highway 96 (approximately 8.96 acres). Miller explained that the applicant requests to 8p1i~ the property into two lots, both of which meet all area and dimension requirements in the 1-1 District. Miller noteuthat a preliminary development plan of the southerly 350' wide lot for ~.W. Grainger, lnc. (a whole- sale distributor) has been received; detailed plans will be sub- mitted with Building Permit application at a later date. , Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommends Cvuncil approval of the lot split as requested. Mr. Griffis explained that he had proposed a previous subdivision of the property into five smaller building sites; now proposes a 2-1ct ~abJlvision. In discussion, it was noted that the Scho1ls site (immediately south of the proposed 350' wide Grainger site) is about 500' in width; ,proposed second let (north of the proposed Grainger lot) will be about 303' wide. Miller noted that the formerly suggested change of access to Highway 96 does not affect the Griffis property; should occur on the property to the north. Wingert moved, seconded by Crichton, that Council approve the lot split as proposed. Motion carried unanimouSly. . Case No. 80-10, Special Use Permit and Lot Split for __ Day Care Center (Kinder-Care) _ Miller referred Council to his report of 4-30-80, transparencies of Ettached development concepts and to the recommendations of the Planning Comm1<lsion (Minutes of 5-7.-80). Miller explained that day care centers accommodating mare than 10 children are per~itted 1n the 8-1 District with a Special Use Permit; propOsed Kinder-Care is designed to accommodate a maximum of 100 children which will require 6 - 10 employees as requited by State law. Miller noted that the lot ar.ea and dimensions exceed ordinance requirements; building coverage is 12% if proposed road easement is included - 16% if excluded (35% permitted); total site coverage excluding easement and Bervice drive 1s 40%, and 46% if service drive is included (75% permitted). Miller reviewed the proposal and noted issues of concern to be resolved: 1. Access to entire Grudnoske property. 2. Use of the site (B-1 property is primarily a professional office district. Dav care centers are permitted by Special Use Permit). -2-