CC 09-09-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . , , Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 9-9-91 Page 7 CASE #91-14 (Cont'd) Mayor Sather ~lained the Council has the responsibility to roaintain uniformity and consistency when enf=ing regulations for development in the City. Art Johnson, park manager, stated opposition to the landscaping requirement. He preferred to roaintain the visibility of the storage area by retaining the chain link fence and referred to the petition suJ:mitted, with residents' signatures, stating they are not opposed to the existing fence. Council1nember Growe stated the residents have ~ressed valid safety COnceJ:TlS, have lived with the existing fence for a rnnnber of years and appear to favor the visibility. Growe stated she will vote against the recommendation for installation of plantings. Motion carried. (Hicks, Malone, Mahowald and Sather voting in favor; Growe opposed) (4-1) Walter Rund, 4590 Lisa Lane, questioned if permits for vinyl siding roay be issued to residents of the mobile home park in the event the management does not comply with the landscaping requirement attached to approval of the SUP. Attorney Filla advised the park management has two options for compliance with the SUP requirement; installation of the landscaping, as approved by Council action as an amendment to the special use permit, or installation of a wooden fence, as required in the originally approved special use permit. He ~lained there are legal remedies the City may pursue to insure compliance and the residents need not be penalized by denying the vinyl siding applications. Council concurred that the City staff may issue vinyl siding permits to residents of the mobile home park. Council recessed at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened at 9:05 p.m. CASE #91-15; MINOR SUBDIV., 1417/1419 ARDEN PlACE, KOZLAK Council was referred to the Planner's rep:xt and Planning Commission llIinutes dated 9-4-91, relative to the request for a Minor SUbdivision/Lot Consolidation, 1417-1419 Arden Place, Kozlak. TIle Planner stated the property owners share a driveway a=ess and have agreed to adjust the property line slightly to resolve a misunderstanding of the exact location of the line. He indicated the city prefers a straight property line, and, therefore, he has suggested an alternative to the proposal suJ:mitted by the applicant. Bergly advised the property owners have agreed to the alternative proposed by staff and are in the process drafting the proper documentation. Mayor Sather questioned if the property line dispute relates to the shared driveway situation and recommended separating the driveways. Planner Bergly advised that the dispute was based on the placement of a fence and would be resolved with the verification of the property line. He noted that the property owners agreed with the recammendation of Planning Commission. Malone InOVed, seconded by Hicks, to approve Case #91-15, Minor SUb:livision and lDt Consolidation, 1417 Arden Place, Iauren Kozlak, with the straight property line, as recommended by the Planner and Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)