Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 8-26-91 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />RES. 91-50; <br />PREMISES PERMIT, <br />AWBA, FIlIHERI'Y' S <br />ARDEN BaoIL, 1273 <br />W. COUNTY ROAD E <br /> <br />Council was referred to a memorandum from Deputy Clerk <br />Iago dated 8-23-91, regarding an awlication for a <br />premises permit for a Charitable Gambling operation, <br />Class B, Pull-Tabs, at Flaherty's Arden BcMI, fran the <br />American Business Women's Association, Lady Slipper <br />Chapter . <br /> <br />Deputy Clerk Iago reported there are currently seven charitable gambling licenses <br />operating in the City; four Class A ani three Class B licenses. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Marlyn Damen, representing ABWA, explained the organization's license to operate <br />within the City of Arden Hills expired on July 31 ani at that time it was not <br />known the opportunity was available to lease space at Flaherty's Arden BcMl. She <br />noted the ABWA license was recently approved to conduct a Bingo operation in the <br />City of Roseville. Damen noted the ABWA would prefer to =ntinue its association <br />with the City of Arden Hills and operate within the City ani requested Council <br />consider waiving the 60 day waiting period. <br /> <br />Malone IlIOved, se=nded by Hicks, to approve Resolution <br />No. 91-50, Premises Permit for American Business Women's Association, for Class B <br />Pull-Tab operation at Flaherty's Arden BcMI, ani, further, that the 60 day <br />waiting period be waived based on the following: 'Ihe organization has operated <br />within the City for a period of time ani the reason for waiting the 60 days is to <br />facilitate background investigation, in this case the awlicants have recently <br />completed the review process, ani the awlicant was unaware of the opportunity to <br />lease space or would have renewed the previous license to operate within the <br />City. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />RES. #91-51; <br />ADOPl' 1991 <br /><XMPENSATION PLAN <br /> <br />Council was referred to a memorandum from the Clerk <br />Administrator dated 8-23-91, outlining the 1991 <br />COI11peJ1Sation recommendations for nonunion errployees. <br /> <br />The Administrator outlined the materials attached to the meIlIOrandum ani <br />recommended adoption of Resolution No. 91-51, 1991 Compensation Plan for Nonunion <br />City Employees. <br /> <br />Councilmernber Malone questioned the maximum rate for Parks Maintenance errployees <br />in the 1990 Pay Plan. <br /> <br />Administrator Berger stated the figure listed as the maximum in the 1990 plan, <br />step 5, is a number developed fram the market study. He noted that in actuality <br />the pay for incumbents in this position is higher than the figure listed, <br /> <br />Malone moved, se=nded by Growe, to adopt Resolution No. <br />91-51, Adopting the 1991 Compensation Plan for Nonunion city Employees. Motion <br />carried unanilllOusly. (5-0) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CouncilInember Malone explained that additional action by Council is required to <br />authorize placement of city errployees on the newly adopted compensation plan. <br />He indicated Council has invested numerous hours in reviewing the compensation <br />plan ani it appears this plan is fair to all errployees ani in full compliance <br />with ~able worth standards, based on an independent analysis of job content <br />ani compensation proportionate to the points established for each position by the <br />study. <br />