CC 06-24-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Mirnrtes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 6-24-91 Page 6 CASE #91-04 (Cont'd) Bergly explained the proposal to relocate the tennis courts to a parking area; it appears there would be a larger I::uffer between the courts and the residential PJ:ape:tties if this location is utilized. He inlicated the new location for the courts is a workable solution. 2. EROSION: since the Planning Carnnission meeting, the College has undertaken erosion controls near the lake, along the west side of the Roseville portion of the canpus and west of the proposed library site on the Arden Hills portion of the canpus. Bergly advised these areas are natural ravines and collect water; most of the erosion is sarrl and most likely would not cause severe damage. He stated the College has atte.npted to control the problem with the placement of the fencing. 3. SCREENING: TIle College has installed plantings on the west side of the canpus to eliminate the breaks in the residential I::uffer; all trees downed by the recent stems have been retOClVed. 4. ACCESS: TIle Planner noted that in addition to the screening issues in this area, the Plarming Canunission ni""",,,"=r1. the possibility of an additional access point f= emergency vehicles in this area. Bergly explained the Fire Ollef identified a sewer easement in the area which may be a reasonable point f= emergency vehicle access. He disCllSS'9d the possible problems if a=ess to the canpus is limited to the entrance at Lydia street. Bergly advised a gate would be installed in this area, with a lock-boX, and the keys to the gate would be in the possession of the Fire Chief. . Bergly noted that access fran Shorewood Drive, on the east side of the canpus, would not be feasible due to topography. 5. STORAGE TANKS: TIle College has requested the assistance of a contractor to work with the PCA regulations and the LJVFD to bring the tanks into oanpliance . 6. HEAVY:mu:IIMENr STORAGE: The College has inlicated that the heavy equipnent is scheduled f= relocation on campus and should not be visible to residents. Bergly advised no plans f= relocation have been subnitted at this time. TIle Planner advised the Plarming Carnnission reconnnended approval of the PUD Concept Plan, with the following conditions: a. Establish a maxi.m.nu of 1250 full-time student pop.liation on canpus. b. A written statement from the Fire Chief, relative to the need for additional access points for emergency vehicles. c. TIle awlicant IllUSt subnit an application f= site Plan Review f= J::uildings identified on the PUD Concept Plan, pri= to issuance of J::uilding permits. The Planner suggested an additional condition be inpJsed which requires the College to revise the existing PUD Concept Plan and incorporate all changes. recanunended by the Roseville Council in 1986; the revised plan should be filed, with the changes incorporated, prior to or as part of the first awlication subnitted f= site plan review. . President Donald Erickson advised that the plan subnitted does incorporate the changes recommended by the Roseville Council, with the exception of the tennis court location. Council1nember Malone questioned the PUD regulations, which outline the time-frame f= sul:Jnission of the General Plan as the next Ii1ase of the awlication process.