CC 05-20-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Arden Hills Council Worksession, 5-20-91 Page 3 . SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING; CHA'IHAM CIRCLE & CDURI' Mahowald moved, secorrled by Hansen, to schedule a Public Hearing to consider the proposed assessment for the improvement of Chatham Circle and Chatham Court by bituminous overlay, on Monday, June 10, 1991, at 7:30 Motion ca=ied unanimously. (5-0) Malone moved, secorrled by GrCMe, to schedule a Public Hearing to consider the Vacation of Drainage and utility Easements located on IDts 1 and 2, Block 1, Northwoods Mdition, 3900 Northwoods Drive, on Monday, June 10, 1991, at 8:00 p.m., at City Hall. Motion ca=ied unanimously. (5-0) p.m., at City Hall. SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING; VACATION OF EASEMENI'S,~ HEALTH, NORl'ID'KlODS REPORl'; PARKING ON lAKE JOHANNA OOULE.VARD Council was referred to a report fram the Public W=ks SUperintendent dated 5-17-91, relative to parking on lake Johanna Boulevard. . winkel reviewed the Safety/Works Committee discussion and recommendation that no variances or permits be issued f= parking on lake Johanna Boulevard. The Committee suggested the resident experiencing the parking problems pursue the offer fram neighbors to park a vehicle on their property. llie Clerk Administrator reported he contacted Commander Bergeron to discuss the parking situation; Bergeron stated if the city directs the County not to issue citations f= parking, County Deputies will CCIIply with the =der. He further advised that Commander Bergeron expressed concern that residents in other areas of the City may also request to park on the street and a precedent would be established. Council concurred to discuss this matter upon receipt of a recommendation fram the Planning Commission. amER BUSINESS MAIIBOX DAMAGE Councilmember Malone requested a report on the damaged mailbox fram the Public Works SUperintendent. Winkel distriJ:uted photographs of the mailbox in question and reported it does not a];pear that the snowplow damaged the mailbox. He also noted the mailbox was inaw:rupLiately installed; displayed diagrams of proper installation, as required by the Post Office. Winkel reviewed City policy relating to damage to mailboxes and suggested the homeowner be forwarded a copy of the proper installation diagram. . lliere was discussion relative to the extent of city responsibility f= replacement of the mailbox. llie Public Works SUperintendent expressed concern that a precedent may be set if the City purchases a replacement mailbox, even though the City staff did not damage the mailbox. After discussion, Council concurred that city staff be instructed to install a replacement mailbox for the property owner as required by the Post Office, and the Public Works SUperintendent be directed to advise the property owner of their responsibility to purchase the replacement mailbox. Council further advised that if the property owner refuses to purchase the replacement mailbox, this matter is deemed resolved and the property owner accepts full responsibility for installing and purchasing the mailbox.