Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council 3 December 28, 1992 <br /> <br />MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt Resolution 92- <br />76 Ordering a Preliminary Feasibility Report in the <br />Matter of the 1993 Pavement Management Improvement. <br />Motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />AWARD SALE OF CITY-OWNED TRUCKS <br /> <br />Council reviewed a memorandum from Administrator Person <br />which reported that the City conducted a closed bid process <br />for the sale of three City vehicles, those vehicles being <br />one-ton truck vehicle #4, one-ton truck vehicle #26, and <br />3/4-ton truck vehicle #17. Person's memorandum reported <br />that sixteen bidders submitted bids and the highest bids <br />received for each vehicle were as follows: <br /> <br />Vehicle #4 Vehicle #26 Vehicle #17 <br />$10,200 - Noonan $9,850 - Noonan $8,200 - Noonan* <br />$ 7,579 - Green $7,269 - Green $5,900 - Noonan* <br />$3,551 - Johnson <br /> <br />*Person's memorandum explained that Noonan's original bid <br />for vehicle #17 was $8,200 but following review of the bids <br />. Noonan withdrew that bid and revised it to $5,900. <br /> <br /> <br />MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Growe, to award the sale of <br />vehicle #4 to Noonan for a sale price of $10,200; <br />vehicle #26 to Noonan for a sale price of $9,850; and <br />vehicle #17 to Noonan for a sale price of $5,900. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks stated that his understanding with <br />regard to bids for vehicle #17 is that bids were opened and <br />both Noonan and Johnson were given an opportunity to revise <br />their bids, Noonan revised his bid to $5,900 while Johnson <br />maintained his original bid of $3,551. Hicks stated that he <br />is comfortable with the process which took place and <br />awarding the sale of vehicle #17 to Noonan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone asked if both the first (Noonan) and <br />second (Johnson) highest bidders for vehicle #17 were given <br />the opportunity to review the bids that were received. <br />Person explained that originally, the highest bidder for <br />vehicle #17 was Noonan at $8,200 and the second highest <br />bidder was Johnson at $3,551; however, following the review <br />of the bids received, Noonan withdrew his bid of $8,200 and <br />revised it to $5,900, Johnson was given the opportunity to <br />revise his bid and he did not choose to do so. <br /> <br />~ In the spirit of a closed bid process, whereby each bidder <br />submits a closed bid rather than going through a negotiation <br />process, Person recommended that the sale of vehicle #17 be <br />awarded to Johnson at $3,551 rather than to Noonan. <br />