Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> Arden Hills Council 7 November 9, 1992 <br /> quality in the existing pond be investigated in <br /> conjunction with these permits. <br /> - With regard to fire protection, per the <br /> recommendations of the Fire Marshall, the entire <br /> complex (including garages) is to be equipped with <br /> a suppression sprinkler system, and fire hydrants <br /> are to be relocated to the satisfaction of the <br /> local Fire Marshall. <br /> - A revised landscape plan be submitted and <br /> approved, which addresses landscaping of the <br /> entire site rather than only the building site. <br /> - Congregate areas be established in courtyard areas <br /> of the complex. <br /> - A bus shelter be provided. <br /> - Signage comply with the City's sign ordinance, <br /> setback and location requirements. <br /> Motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> CASE NO. 92-19 <br /> WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM <br /> . FOR ACCESSORY BUILDING <br /> OWEN RASMUSSEN, 2020 THOM DRIVE <br /> As background for Case #92-19, Bergly reported that the <br /> applicant's lot at 2020 Thorn Drive in an R-2 district, is <br /> about 20,000 square feet in area (nearly twice the required <br /> R-2 lot size of 11,000 square feet). He explained that the <br /> applicant has requested waiver of the development moratorium <br /> ordinance to construct a 24 ft. X 40 ft. (960 square foot) <br /> 10-foot high eave line garage/storage building on his <br /> property. <br /> Bergly further explained that current ordinance does not <br /> limit the size of such accessory buildings, but the proposed <br /> revised zoning ordinance would limit the maximum size of <br /> such accessory buildings to 700 square feet. He pointed <br /> out that because the applicant's lot is considerably larger <br /> than the R-2 minimum lot size, the ratio of the proposed- <br /> sized accessory building to the applicant's large lot would <br /> be comparable to the ratio of a standard-sized garage to a <br /> standard-sized lot. <br /> Bergly added that the applicant's home is also considerably <br /> larger than other homes in the neighborhood, and the <br /> proposed accessory building was part of original plans for <br /> . the lot. He stated the applicant was originally advised <br /> that the proposed building was consistent with the existing <br /> ordinance and was not aware of the recently imposed <br /> development moratorium until he applied for a building <br /> permit for the accessory building. <br />