Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Ard~n H~.lls COllTICiJ <br /> <br />,A.ugu.St. 3' I 1992 <br /> <br />1? <br /> <br />Councilmember Mahowald asked that the assessment process be <br />clearly explained in the notices. Attorney Filla stated <br />that individual notices would state the maximum potential <br />assessment assumillg the engiI~eer-' s esti.mate of construction <br />costs plus overheadl divided by the number of parcels. He <br />added that tIle actual assessment can be less tllan ttlG amount <br />listed in the ~Qticel but not morel and would be determined <br />~ater according to the appraiser's opjnioD regarding <br />benefit. Engineer Graham said abo~t eight parcels are <br />i,nvolvec1, <br /> <br />Attorney Filla advised that if Council wishes to conduct the <br />assessment hearing prior to awardirlg the project, it woul~ <br />be a tight schedule since bid prices are only good for 90 <br />days. <br /> <br />:::ISCUSSION <br /> <br />]99~ STREET IMPROVEMENTS <br /> <br />Ccn~J-;ciJ 'cevjJ:'T;,led a letter dated August 27: 1.9::2 from <br />~ngj.neer Graham wherej.n Graha~ suggested Council corsider <br />thp 1993 street ~ehabilitatj,or and pavement majntenance <br />program so that necessary feasi1)i,1~ty studies and field <br />infnymation ~an be completed before i.nclement weather. <br /> <br />Enginesr Graham stated that current street ratings j,ndicate <br />that ~he next two streets requiriI19 reconstruction are <br />Bussard Court (Snelling Avenue to the west cul-de-sac), and <br />Dunlap Avenue (Ingerson Road to Cannon Avenue). <br /> <br />Councilmember Mahowald commented that during preliminary <br />budget discussions, it was Council ccnsenSllS to concentrate <br />on overlay and sealcoatirlg projects in 1993 due to limited <br />funds and t~he fact that several projects were done in 1992. <br />Council,membel: Malone said that Council consensus does not <br />preclude taking a look at Bussard Court and Dunlap Avenue <br /> <br />?,CEBDUI,E TRUTH TN_':'1\XATIOIL HE1'EULQf <br /> <br />Council reviewed Truth i,n Taxation Provi.sicLS f~00 Ramsey <br />CCJllnty Dep3Ytr;',ent of Taxation and Records Administ.r.a.t.ion, <br />and a merriorandum from staff suggesting possible dates for <br />the City's Truth in Taxation Fublj,c hearing. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />~alone movedF seconded by Growe, to schedule the City's <br />Truth in Taxation public hearing for Monday, November <br />30, 1992 at 7:30, with a continuation hearing (i~ <br />needed) on December 10, 1992 at 7:30. ~otion carrie:} <br />unanimoLsly (5-0). <br />