My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-29-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CC 06-29-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:10 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:32:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />June 29, 1992 <br /> <br />UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />J2Rljl),;RAJ RE STORA T I or'LA T __.HHl NORTH <br />SNELLING AVENUE - FRANCIS PODLASEK <br /> <br />Francis podlasek was asked to explain the problems he has <br />with his driveway. He stated that everything he would say <br />was included in his letter to the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Podlasek's letter explained that he was dissatisfied <br />with the steepness of his driveway entrance resulting from <br />the reconstruction of North Snelling Avenue and appealed to <br />the City Council for financial reimbursement to reconstruct <br />his driveway and yard to conform with the new, lower <br />elevation road in front of his house. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Engineer Graham advised that through the process of speaking <br />with residents before the reconstruction project began, he <br />discussed with Mr. Podlasek the options available within the <br />project to address his driveway. Graham reported that he <br />proposed to Mr. Podlasek extending the bituminous patching <br />up his driveway to a point 40 feet from the road in an <br />effort to create a gradual slope to the road; however, Mr. <br />Podlasek rejected that option and directed Graham to replace <br />blacktop only to the easement line with a slope not to <br />exceed 10%. <br /> <br />Graham added that after construction was completed per Mr. <br />Podlasek's direction and conforming to standards, Mr. <br />podlasek expressed his dissatisfaction, Graham responded by <br />letter, and Mr. Podlasek's response was directed to the <br />Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated he has viewed the driveway. He <br />asked Graham if elevations of the road change after a <br />project such as this, and who is responsible to address <br />that. Graham said that in many instances elevations do <br />change and driveways must be adjusted, that typically the <br />adjustment takes place within the right-of-way. He added <br />that the elevation change in this instance was minimal, but <br />apparently Mr. podlasek disagrees, and the 40 foot driveway <br />cut was offered to reduce the severity of the slope of the <br />driveway, but Mr. Podlasek declined. Graham said every <br />reasonable attempt was made to avoid this problem. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. podlasek said some driveways affected by this project <br />were graded well, but he is dissatisfied with his driveway <br />because the slope at the end of the driveway causes vehicles <br />to "bottom out". He emphasized that the old driveway did <br />not have the severe slope, it was caused by a change in the <br />elevation of the road. He added that his yard also has a <br />severe bank which will require landscaping or excavation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.