Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 2-10-92 <br />Page 13 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />KEITHSON (Cont'd) Malone moved, seconded by Growe, that Attorney Filla be <br />authorized to offer a stipulation when negotiating with <br />for a permanent drainage easement for Keithson pond area, that the property 0ltl00r <br />be allOltled to reconfigure or relocate the existing ponding area located on his <br />property southwest of the Keithson area, when future development =, provided <br />that the pond retains the same storage capacity as the design outlined in the <br />area st=m drainage plans. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />Engineer Maurer suggested formal execution of the bid contract be held, pending <br />further modifications to the plans. <br /> <br />RES. #92-15; <br />1992 PARK/TRAIL <br />IMPROVEMENTS <br /> <br />Council was referred to the Park Director's memorandum <br />dated 2-6-92, relating to the proposed 1992 Park and <br />Trail IIrprovements. <br /> <br />Park Director Buckley advised the Parks committee recommendations as outlined in <br />his memorandum. He suggested engineering studies be completed for the trail <br />paving project and field improvement projects at Perry and Valentine Parks. <br /> <br />Buckley reported on meetings with area residents to discuss the proposed <br />improvements; five residents appeared to discuss the improvements. He indicated <br />another meeting is proposed with the residents after the trail is staked f= <br />viewing . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone questioned the necessity of a feasibility studY, since this <br />is a park improvement; usually the study is required when the improvement is <br />proposed for assessment to residents. <br /> <br />Buckley explained it is his understanding the feasibility study is requested to <br />determine costs prior to advertisement for bids. <br /> <br />Engineer Maurer advised the feasibility studY is the first step in the process <br />for estimating the economic feasibility of a project; if Council is comfortable <br />with the costs presented and the ~ture, it may be appropriate to eliminate <br />this step and move to the preparation of plans and specifications. <br /> <br />Malone questioned if the Park Director contacted the engineer to inquire if the <br />feasibility study was necessary f= this project. <br /> <br />Maurer explained the feasibility study was not discussed, only the proposed park <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Malone recalled this same discussion regarding the necessity of a feasibility <br />study f= the 1991 park improvements. <br /> <br />The Park Director stated he stands corrected. <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to authorize the <br />engineer to prepare plans and specifications for the 1992 Park and Trail <br />IIrprovements. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor MahOltlald suggested the Park Director hold another meeting with <br />residents upon completion of the plans and specifications for this project. He <br />questioned if the plans include s=eening along the pathway. <br />