My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 01-27-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CC 01-27-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:11 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:32:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 1-27-92 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />RES. #92-08; <br />ADOPI' NO <br />SM:)KING POLICY <br /> <br />Council was referred to a memorardum fram the city <br />Accountant, Program SUpervisor arxi Administrative <br />Secretary dated 1-24-92, recommen:ling a Smoke Free <br />City Hall policy. <br /> <br />Council.Irember Malone advised he discussed this matter with the Administrator arxi <br />noted that the City is TlOi/ in c:artpliance with state statute. He expressed concem <br />that the meIl'Drardum recommen:ling the policy was forwarded to eouncil fram staff <br />rather than Department Heads. He further expressed concem that this matter <br />requires managerial intervention; noted the memorardum does not mention all <br />employees have been advised of the proposed policy. Malone suggested the matter <br />be tabled until such time as all employees have been advised of the policy arxi <br />offered an opportunity to express concerns. <br /> <br />Malone noted the policy should not include the reference to "chewing tobacco", <br />since the action does not create smoke. <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to table action on the <br />policy until such time as management has had an opportunity to meet with all <br />staff members to determine if there are any problems with the proposed policy. <br /> <br />MahcMald moved, seconded by Malone to amend the motion to require <br />that management provide a specific recommendation to eouncil at their first <br />Regular Meeting in February. Amended motion =ied unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />Original motion as amended =ied unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />eouncil.Irember Mahowald stated he is opposed to deferring action on this matter <br />arxi indicated he would have brought the item to Council for action if the staff <br />had not initiated the policy. He favored staff taking the initiative to present <br />the proposal. <br /> <br />eouncil.Irember Hicks agreed with the points noted by Malone arxi suggested the <br />Deparbnent Heads offer all employees the uH:JU.LlLU1ity to review the policy prior <br />to adoption by Council. He indicated Council should be sensitive to the needs of <br />the smoking employees arxi hear concerns. <br /> <br />'!he Clerk Administrator advised the recommendation fram the employees was based <br />on a proposed change in health care insurance coverage, which provided a diSCOlll1t <br />in costs if the City Hall is designated as a "smoke-free" envirornnent. He stated <br />he has not discussed the matter with individuals who currently smoke. Berger <br />suggested tabling action on this matter would provide him an opportunity to <br />discuss the matter with all employees arxi make a recommendation to Council <br />regarding the policy. <br /> <br />eouncil.Irember Malone indicated that such policy changes should be discussed with <br />all employees pri= to subnission f= Council action. <br /> <br />'Ihe Clerk Administrator advised the memorardum was reviewed by him pri= to <br />subnission for Council action. He stated the staff put a subtantial amount of <br />research into the matter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.