Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />July 12, 1993 <br /> <br />interested in delineating a road alignment to be on file to <br />indicate the City's interest and willingness to provide <br />appropriate right-of-way in the study area when the affected <br />properties are sold or subdivided in the future. <br /> <br />Bergly pointed out that the Planning Commission recommended <br />that the alignment of the Shoreline Lane connection be a <br />straight line between the existing dead ends. He noted <br />that doing so would allow a maximum of nine lots to be <br />created - three along Lexington Avenue and three on either <br />side of the proposed Shoreline Lane connection. <br /> <br />City Engineer Maurer further explained that existing <br />sanitary sewer lines and easements in and around the study <br />area were researched, and assuming the straight line <br />Shoreline Lane connection alignment, sanitary sewer service <br />could be provided via Lexington Avenue for lots potentially <br />created along Lexington Avenue while sanitary sewer service <br />to the remainder of the study area would require easement <br />acquisition through the Andersen and Bachman properties, <br /> <br />Maurer stated that, assuming the straight through Shoreline <br />Lane concept plan, estimated costs to provide services to <br />the nine lots would be $22,630 for total sanitary sewer, <br />$15,760 for water, and $11,517 for overhead, for a total of <br />$49,907. <br /> <br />Following the order of signatures on the guest register, <br />comments from citizens were invited. Comments made by <br />citizens are as follows (not verbatim). <br /> <br />Dorothy Harty, 3137 Shoreline Lane: I object to the concept <br />plan presented this evening, and question whether the six <br />lots created between Lexington Avenue and the proposed <br />Shoreline Lane connection would be standard size. I wonder <br />how this entire matter came about since neither Andersen nor <br />Bachman are interested in subdividing, <br /> <br />Bergly noted that the six conceptual lots between Lexington <br />Avenue and the proposed Shoreline Lane connection would be <br />slightly under the minimum lot size for this zoning <br />district, but perhaps the potential lots could consider <br />shared driveways for maximum use of the property. He added <br />that this matter was prompted from a desire by the City to <br />plan ahead for sensible and logical future development. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone clarified that the matter being <br />considered this evening is actually two fold in that there <br />is a concern to plan ahead for both a logical alignment of a <br />