My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-14-1993
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
CC 06-14-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:13 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:42:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />June 14, 1993 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Filla commented that all the municipal units of government <br />involved have fallen victim to this same scenario. He <br />reported which units, to date, had chosen to participate in <br />the proposed settlement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks agreed with Councilmember Aplikowski's <br />summation that this entire situation appears to be <br />"blackmail" but he added that Council's charge is to resolve <br />the matter in the least expensive manner. <br /> <br />Councilmember Probst commented that it is blatantly wrong <br />that Arden Hills and other municipal units of government <br />were named in this suit, and while he finds the situation <br />distasteful, he believes the City has no choice but to <br />participate in the proposed settlement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone asked if the City could in any way be <br />found responsible for the waste haulers licensed by the <br />City. Filla stated that contributors are divided into the <br />categories of generators, haulers, or operators, and the <br />City cannot be named responsible for simply licensing <br />haulers to collect waste throughout the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that he favors participation in <br />the proposed settlement because it appears to be a rational <br />step in protecting the interest of the City. He said he <br />agreed that the cost is unjust, but he understands that the <br />cost to clean up the environment must be paid somehow. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to authorize the Mayor <br />to execute the Consent Decree drafted May 24, 1993 and <br />Trust Agreement drafted May 17, 1993 provided that such <br />signatures shall not be effective until the date on <br />which the Consent Decree is entered into Federal <br />District Court. Motion carried (4-1; Aplikowski voted <br />nay, all others voted aye). <br /> <br />REVIEW PROPOSED OFFICIAL MAP OF <br />EXTENSION OF SHORELINE LANE <br /> <br />City Attorney Filla stated that a request has been received <br />to connect two existing portions of Shoreline Lane (a <br />north/south street located about 250 feet west of Lexington <br />Avenue, which presently is separated by two dead ends) to <br />create a straight through continuous connected street. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone clarified that this matter was reviewed <br />and discussed by the Planning Commission in February and <br />March of 1992, however, no official action was taken. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.