My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-14-1993
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
CC 06-14-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:13 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:42:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />',' . <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />June 14, 1993 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Councilmember Probst recalled that perhaps the reason this <br />matter was not brought to closure when it came before the <br />Planning Commission was that although many residents were <br />represented at the meetings, some affected parties were not <br />available for input, therefore, other options were examined. <br /> <br />Administrator Person stated that a public hearing would be <br />required before action could be taken, and staff is seeking <br />direction from Council as to what options they wish to <br />consider. she advised that one of the expected Planning <br />Commission agenda items, probably in August 1993, involves <br />proposed subdivision of the Hanson property, which would be <br />directly affected by extension of Shoreline Lane. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked if the straight through <br />connection of the two portions of Shoreline Lane would be a <br />positive move from a utilities standpoint. Public Works <br />Superintendent Winkel said it would be, and it would also be <br />better for the Hanson property. Councilmember Malone added <br />that connection of the street would be an improvement from <br />the standpoint of traffic circulation and emergency vehicle <br />access. <br /> <br />Filla said this street connection is not part of the City's <br />official street map, but could be added to the map, <br />thereafter considered a "paper street". He added that <br />doing so should not be difficult and could be accomplished <br />by staff perhaps with the assistance of City consultants. <br />Councilmember Malone said that adding the street to the <br />City's official street map would allow the City to plan for <br />the street connection. <br /> <br />Mayor sather commented that it appears that any option other <br />than creating a straight through connection of the two <br />portions of Shoreline Lane could be problematic. <br />Councilmember Hicks recalled that the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation was for the straight through connection. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to direct staff <br />to prepare the necessary background information and <br />proposed amendments to the official City street map for <br />Council review prior to Council consideration of <br />setting a public hearing regarding the possible <br />connection of the two existing portions of Shoreline <br />Lane. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.