Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />Apri 1 12, 1993 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />City Engineer Graham introduced himself to the audience and <br />stated that this evening's hearing is required by law as a <br />means of providing the public a forum for public input <br />regard an improvement project, in this instance, the 1993 <br />Pavement Maintenance Program for bituminous overlay and <br />seal coating of streets within the City. <br /> <br />Graham explained that rating of City streets involves <br />periodic examination to determine condition and then a <br />determination is made by the City Engineer, with input from <br />the Public Works Department, as to the best available means <br />of protecting each street and extending its useful life. <br /> <br />Graham explained the processes to complete a 1-1/2 inch <br />bituminous overlay or seal coating of existing street <br />surfaces. He illustrated on a map the street segments <br />proposed to receive overlay or seal coat in 1993. <br /> <br />Graham announced that this evening, estimated assessment <br />amounts can be provided, but the actual assessment hearing <br />on this matter is scheduled to take place in May 1993; at <br />that hearing, the public will have an opportunity to <br />specifically discuss matters relative to assessments. <br /> <br />Graham explained that the City's Assessment Policy calls for <br />all seal coating work to be paid 100% by the City; all <br />bituminous overlay work to be paid 50% by the City and 50% <br />by the benefiting property owners, on a front footage basis. <br />He explained the method of calculating assessments for <br />corner lots or lots abutting other streets which have been <br />improved and assessed, <br /> <br />Graham noted that some of the benefiting property owners in <br />the 1993 Pavement Maintenance Program are townhome owners. <br />He stated that a determination has been made that an <br />assessment cannot legally be levied on a townhome <br />association, therefore, the assessment for the streets <br />benefiting the townhome owners is proposed to be spread <br />amongst townhome owners on a per unit basis. <br /> <br />Graham stated that the Feasibility Report for this project <br />estimated a residential front footage assessment of $3.03. <br />He added that bids were opened on April 6, and assuming the <br />project would be awarded to the low bidder, and applying the <br />City's assessment policy (whereby benefiting property owners <br />pay for 50% of the cost), the front footage assessment for <br />residential property owners would be $2.98 per front foot, <br />and the per unit assessment for townhome owners would be <br />$63.78. <br />