CC 03-08-1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Arden Hills Council 7 March 8, 1993 . Bergly explained that the applicant has expressed a desire for a windscreen in the chain link fence, and to move some trees from the property and replant them along the tennis court, blended with existing trees, to help screen the visual effects of the windscreen. He advised that the zoning ordinance has a "30% open" requirement for fencing, which would require a variance if a windscreen were allowed. With regard to the reconfiguration plans for the student drop off in front of the school, Bergly described the one- way in/out traffic pattern for traffic entering from and exiting onto County Road F. He stated that the reconfiguration would include changing the location of the vehicle parking area, moving parked vehicles closer to the County Road F right-of-way. He added that the applicant will be required to obtain a permit from the County prior to construction, and it is possible that a parking setback variance will also be required. . Bergly reported that the Planning Commission has considered this case and recommended variances for the fencing height and "30% open" issues. He added that they further recommended 1) Amending the landscape plan to include two rows of deciduous trees planted along the tennis court fence to lessen the visual effect of the windscreen, 2) Bike parking be provided near the tennis courts, 3) Speed bumps be located in the student drop off area, and 4) A lighting plan (compatible with the stadium lighting scheduled) be presented. Councilmember Aplikowski opposed the recommendation from Planning Commission with regard to speed bumps in the student drop off area. She offered the opinion that speed bumps are not necessary or appropriate in this instance. She also stated that absolute caution must be taken to assure that the configuration of any deciduous trees or other landscaping in the front of this area does not hamper visibility for traffic entering or exiting the school, or create dark secluded areas which could create security concerns. Bergly said landscaping could be arranged in such a configuration to assure the greatest possible safety, security and visibility. Councilmember Probst commented that it would be reasonable for the City to impose a condition that any trees that are planted and do not survive must be replaced. . Councilmember Malone asked if the applicant is aware of the new regulations regarding "trespass" lighting. Bergly stated that it may be reasonable to mention that matter within Council's motion on this case.