CC 01-11-1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . Arden Hills Council January 11, 1993 4 CASE #92-23 - MINOR SUBDIVISION & LOT COMBINATIO~ASHBACH PROPERTY 1585 LAKE JOHANNA BOULEVARD planner Bergly explained the configuration of the existing lots involved in this action and the applicant's plans to subdivide and consolidate. In summary, the applicant was proposing the creation of Tracts A and B from one existing parcel, then the combination of Tract A with the lot directly to the south containing Marjorie Ashbach's home. Bergly noted that if this total proposal is approved, there is a need for an access easement to utilize the present driveway to Oak Avenue as access to the Ashbach home. He added that such an agreement exists. Bergly illustrated that the newly created Tract B will have an extremely deep slope, therefore, it may require review and perhaps a variance prior to allowing future building. Bergly stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot division subject to the following conditions: I. That the action include recognition that access to Tract B is across the existing roadway easement to Johanna Boulevard, 2. That a document combining Tract A with the lot immediately to the south and an easement document providing access on the present driveway to Oak Avenue across the large parcel to the east be approved by the City Attorney and the lot division, lot combination and access easement documents are filed concurrently with the County, 3. That any setback variances required on Tract B must be applied for when and if they are needed and that such variances are not included in this action, 4. That prior to any future divisions of any of the four parcels involved in this application, a subdivision or development sketch be prepared showing how such a proposed division will fit into the long-range plans for the total property. Bergly added that, in addition to the four conditions listed above, he recommends additional conditions, as follows: 5. A covenant be attached to Tract B limiting potential future development of that Tract to only one single- family residence, The City Engineer review and approve this case. 6.