CC 01-11-1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Arden Hills Council 5 January 11, 1993 Bergly commented that the applicant has agreed to all six condi ti ons . Councilmember Malone commented that typically an arrangement such as this, with no access to an improved street would not be allowed, however, this is a unique situation, and the access issue appears to be addressed within the conditions. MOTION: . Malone moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to approve Case #92-23, Minor Subdivision/Lot Consolidation at 1585 Johanna Boulevard, with the following conditions: 1. That the action include recognition that access to Tract B is across the existing roadway easement to Johanna Boulevard, That a document combining Tract A with the lot immediately to the south and an easement document providing access on the present driveway to Oak Avenue across the large parcel to the east be approved by the City Attorney and the lot division, lot combination and access easement documents are filed concurrently with the County, That any setback variances required on Tract B must be applied for when and if they are needed and that such variances are not included in this action, That prior to any future divisions of any of the four parcels involved in this application, a subdivision or development sketch be prepared showing how such a proposed division will fit into the long-range plans for the total property, A covenant be attached to Tract B limiting potential future development of that Tract to only one single- family residence, The City Engineer review and approve this case. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Motion carried unanimously (3-0). CASE #92-24 - LOT COMBINATION: DAN ASHBACH, 1567 OAK AVENUE . Planner Bergly reported that Case #92-24 involves a simple combination of two parcels. He explained that there is an existing home located about one to two feet from the lot line separating the two parcels, and there has been a covenant attached in previous variance action requiring that prior to selling the residence the lots are to be combined, as is now proposed. Bergly reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this lot consolidation subject to City Attorney's approval of all documents prior to filing with the County.