CC 12-27-1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, .. , Minute. of Regular Council Meeting Tuesday, December 27, 1983 Page Tbree Hauer said that they would like it to be an annual event: reported that the committee worked hard and had fun doing it: thanked Parks Director Buckley for hia assistance to the committee. Hicks moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council accepts and thanks the business community and Chamber for their contribution to the Park Fund. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) . Hauer asked Council's cooperation again next year at Fall Festival time. Annual Institute for Building Officials - Larry Squires Council was referred to Squires' memo (12/21/83) re Annual Institute for Building Officiale. McAllister moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council approve the $8,0.00 registration fee and $85/day remuneration for time and travel expense as per memo. Motion ~arried unanimously. (5-0) OTHER BUSINESS Time Extenaion Request - Harold H. Alexander Coun~il was referred to letter from Mr. Alexander (12/22/83) requesting a 6-month extension of the variance for construction of a house on Lot 12, Block 4, Josephine Hills. Hicks moved, seconded by Christiansen, that Council approve the 6 month extension to August 1984. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) County Road E and Hamline Traffic Problem Council was referred to memo from Glen VanWormer regarding the intersection traffic concerns at Hamline and County Road E. After a brief discussion, Council concurred that a copy of the memo be eent to Mr. Salitros, requesting that he respond to the memo, in writing, in order to frame the issue prior to Council'. consideration at a later meeting. Boschwitz' Response re ,Use of Arsenal Property Council discussed the co-use suggestion of arsenal property for ball fields. Concern was exereaaed that the "teJllPorary' use" is too indefinite for the sizeable expenditure by the City to ~reate and maintain ball fields. Count Road E/Snellin Avenue Hi hwa Easement - Letter to Attorne General's Office (11/22 83), objecting to the use of the land for . an athletic purpose. In discussion, it was noted that the existing fence was erected by the County; City installed the backstop; the major use of the land is not for an athletic field. It was noted that the County Commissioners dealt with this matter about a year ago. Application for Reduction in Assessed Valuation Council was referred to letter from State re application filed by Terry R. Evenson. No action was taken by Council.